Citation for published item:viskeD tF nd fldryD sFuF nd hriverD FF nd u'sD FtF nd elpslnD wF nd endreD iF nd froughD F nd gluverD wFiF nd qrootesD wFF nd qunwrdhnD wFvFF nd uelvinD vFF nd vovedyD tF nd oothmD eFFqF nd ylorD iFxF nd fmfordD FF nd flndErwthornD tF nd frownD wFtFsF nd hrinkwterD wFtF nd ropkinsD eFwF nd weyerD wFtF nd xorergD F nd eokD tFeF nd egiusD xFuF nd endrewsD FuF nd fuerD eFiF nd ghingD tFrFF nd gollessD wF nd gonselieD gFtF nd groomD FwF nd hviesD vFtFwF nd he roprisD F nd hunneD vF nd irdleyD iFwF nd illisD F nd posterD gF nd prenkD gFF nd r¤ ußlerD fF nd rolwerdD fFF nd rowlettD gF nd srrD rF nd trvisD wFtF nd tonesD hFrF nd u)eD FF nd veyD gFqF nd vngeD F nd vrEv¡ opezD wFeF nd v¡ opezE¡ nhezD ¡ eFF nd wddoxD F nd wdoreD fFpF nd wxughtEoertsD F nd wo'ettD eFtF nd xiholD FgF nd ywersD wFF nd lmrD hF nd ennyD FtF nd hillippsD F nd imletD uFeF nd opesuD gFgF nd resottD wF nd rotorD F nd dlerD iFwF nd nsomD eFiF nd eiertD wF nd hrpD F nd utherlndD F nd ¡ zquezEwtD tFeF nd vn umpenD iF nd ilkinsD FwF nd illimsD F nd rightD eFrF @PHISA 9qlxy end wss essemly @qeweA X end of survey report nd dt relese PF9D wonthly noties of the oyl estronomil oietyFD RSP @PAF ppF PHVUEPIPTF Further information on publisher's website: Additional information: Use policyThe full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. ABSTRACTThe Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA) survey is one of the largest contemporary spectroscopic surveys of low redshift galaxies. Covering an area of ∼286 deg 2 (split among five survey regions) down to a limiting magnitude of r < 19.8 mag, we have collected spectra and reliable redshifts for 238 000 objects using the AAOmega spectrograph on the Anglo-Australian Telescope. In addition, we have assembled imaging data from a number of independent surveys in order to generate photometry spanning the wavelength range 1 nm-1 m. Here, we report on the recently completed spectroscopic survey and present a series of diagnostics to assess its final state and the quality of the redshift data. We also describe a number of survey aspects and procedures, or updates thereof, including changes to the input catalogue, redshifting and re-redshifting, and the derivation of ultraviolet, optical and near-infrared photometry. Finally, we present the second public release of GAMA data. In this release, we provide input catalogue and targeting information, spectra, redshifts, ultraviolet, optical and near-infrared photometry, single-component Sérsic fits, stellar masses, Hα-derived star formation rates, environment information, and group p...

We use data from the Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA) survey in the redshift range 0.01

We combine wide and deep galaxy number-count data from theGalaxy And Mass Assembly, COSMOS/G10, Hubble Space Telescope (HST) Early Release Science, HST UVUDF, and various near-, mid-, and far-IR data sets from ESO, Spitzer, and Herschel. The combined data range from the far UV (0.15 μm) to far-IR (500 μm), and in all cases the contribution to the integrated galaxy light (IGL) of successively fainter galaxies converges. Using a simple spline fit, we derive the IGL and the extrapolated IGL in all bands. We argue that undetected low-surfacebrightness galaxies and intracluster/group light are modest, and that our extrapolated-IGL measurements are an accurate representation of the extragalactic background light (EBL). Our data agree with most earlier IGL estimates and with direct measurements in the far IR, but disagree strongly with direct estimates in the optical. Close agreement between our results and recent very high-energy experiments (H.E.S.S. and MAGIC) suggests that there may be an additional foreground affecting the direct estimates. The most likely culprit could be the adopted model of zodiacal light. Finally we use a modified version of the two-component model to integrate the EBL and obtain measurements of the cosmic optical background (COB) and cosmic infrared background of -+ 24 4 4 nW m −2 sr −1 and -+ 26 5 5 nW m −2 sr −1 respectively (48%:52%). Over the next decade, upcoming space missions such as Euclid and the Wide Field Infrared Space Telescope will have the capacity to reduce the COB error to <1%, at which point comparisons to the very high-energy data could have the potential to provide a direct detection and measurement of the reionization field.

We use the energy-balance code MAGPHYS to determine stellar and dust masses, and dust corrected star-formation rates for over 200,000 GAMA galaxies, 170,000 G10-COSMOS galaxies and 200,000 3D-HST galaxies. Our values agree well with previously reported measurements and constitute a representative and homogeneous dataset spanning a broad range in stellar mass (10 8 -10 12 M ), dust mass (10 6 -10 9 M ), and star-formation rates (0.01-100M yr −1 ), and over a broad redshift range (0.0 < z < 5.0). We combine these data to measure the cosmic star-formation history (CSFH), the stellar-mass density (SMD), and the dust-mass density (DMD) over a 12 Gyr timeline. The data mostly agree with previous estimates, where they exist, and provide a quasi-homogeneous dataset using consistent mass and star-formation estimators with consistent underlying assumptions over the full time range. As a consequence our formal errors are significantly reduced when compared to the historic literature. Integrating our cosmic star-formation history we precisely reproduce the stellar-mass density with an ISM replenishment factor of 0.50 ± 0.07, consistent with our choice of Chabrier IMF plus some modest amount of stripped stellar mass. Exploring the cosmic dust density evolution, we find a gradual increase in dust density with lookback time. We build a simple phenomenological model from the CSFH to account for the dust mass evolution, and infer two key conclusions: (1) For every unit of stellar mass which is formed 0.0065-0.004 units of dust mass is also formed; (2) Over the history of the Universe approximately 90 to 95 per cent of all dust formed has been destroyed and/or ejected.