No abstract

Purpose: The correction of severe, stiff scoliosis in children is challenging. One method used to reduce the risk is preoperative halo gravity traction (HGT). In this study, the authors sought to define the efficiency and safety of HGT and characterize the chronology of the correction seen. Method: A consecutive group of pediatric patients with severe spinal deformities was treated with HGT before definitive correction. A standard protocol with the daily addition of weight to 50% of body weight at 3 weeks was used. Traction remained in place until signs of impending neurological complication or 6 weeks, whichever was sooner. Results: Twenty-four patients were included with a mean age of 11.8 years. The mean coronal deformity was 123 degrees, with a T1-L5 height of 234 mm. The mean duration of traction was 42 days with a mean improvement in height of 72 mm with 82% occurring over the first 3 weeks. Hundred percent of the angular and 98% of T1-L5 height correction was reached by 6 weeks. One patient showed early signs of a cranial nerve palsy prompting early surgery and 8 patients showed pin loosening, 1 of which required revision of their halo. One patient underwent a slower progression of traction because of transitory urinary disturbance. Following fusion, angular correction of the major curve was 49%. Conclusion: HGT is a safe treatment for severe, stiff scoliosis because it can respond to early signs of impending neurological impairment. The first 3 weeks of treatment, reaching 50% of body weight as a traction force accounts for 80% of correction, with the remaining 20% in the following 2 weeks. At least 4 weeks of traction is recommended when following this protocol.

No abstract

Background: There is significant variability in clinically important improvement (CII) criteria for spinal surgery that suggest population-and diagnosis-specific thresholds are required to determine surgical success using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). This study establishes surgical CII thresholds for 4 common lumbar degenerative spinal diagnoses using accepted anchor-based methodology and commonly used PROMs. Methods: CII analysis was conducted using baseline and 1-year data from participants in the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) registry who underwent surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS), disc herniation (DH) or degenerative disc (DD) from 2015 to 2018. One-year CII thresholds were determined for the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and back and leg Numeric Pain Rating Scales (NPRS). At 1 year, patients reported whether they were much better, better, the same, worse or much worse compared with before their surgery. This was used as the anchor (improved: ≥ "better" v. not improved: ≤ "same") to determine CII thresholds for absolute change and percentage change for PROMs using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve approach, with maximization of the Youden index as primary criterion. Correct classification rates were determined. Results: There were 856 participants with LSS (39.1% female, mean age 65.8 yr), 591 with DS (64.1% female, mean age 65.8 yr), 520 with DH (47.5% female, mean age 46.8 yr) and 185 with DD (43.8% female, mean age 50.9 yr). CII for ODI change ranged from -10.0 (DD) to -16.9 (DH). CII for back and leg NPRS change was -2 to -3 for each group. CII for percentage change varied by PROM and pathology group, ranging from -11.1% (ODI for DD) to -50.0% (leg NPRS for DH). Correct classification rates for all CII thresholds ranged from 72.1% to 89.4%. Conclusion: This work quantifies Canadian CII thresholds for the ODI and back and leg NPRS for 4 common lumbar spinal surgery cohorts, with high classification accuracy. Our results suggest that use of generic CII across different diagnoses in spine surgery is not advised. This study establishes the first comprehensive set of responder criteria in Canada for broader application and specificity in clinical and research settings and for surgical prognostic work.