Background Factors associated with progression and survivals in rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) have not been described in a large center China cohort. Methods Seven-hundred and ninety-one consecutive RA patients who completed lung HRCT were considered as potential participants in this retrospective cohort study. Determinants of ILD progression were identified through multivariable logistic analysis. Cox hazards analysis was used to determine significant variables associated with survival. Results Of 307 patients diagnosed with RA-ILD, 266 were finally included. The 3-year survival rate of RA-ILD patients was 81.24%, and the 5-year survival rate was 69.71%. A total of 82 deaths occurred during follow-up, of which 56 died of respiratory failure due to ILD progression and/or pneumonia while 14 with malignancies (8 with lung cancer). Logistic regression analysis showed that anti-CCP antibody high titer positive (OR: 4.03, 95% CI: 1.04-15.69) and DLCO% < 45% (OR: 8.31, 95% CI: 2.17-31.75) were independent risk factors for the ILD progression. Cox hazards analysis revealed that advanced age (> 60 years old) of RA-ILD diagnosis (HR: 2.32, 95% CI: 1.27-4.25) and extensive lung involvement on HRCT (HR: 2.19, 95% CI: 1.24-3.87) were associated with worse survival. Treatment with cyclophosphamide (HR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.26-0.69) was associated with better survival. Conclusions In RA-ILD patients, anti-CCP antibody high titer positive and DLCO% < 45% are risk factors for ILD progression. Advanced age and extensive lung involvement on HRCT, rather than the baseline UIP pattern, independently predict mortality after controlling for potentially influential variables. Furthermore, cyclophosphamide treatment helps to improve the prognosis in real-world experience.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.