Background Auditory stimulation has emerged as a promising tool to enhance non-invasively sleep slow waves, deep sleep brain oscillations that are tightly linked to sleep restoration and are diminished with age. While auditory stimulation showed a beneficial effect in lab-based studies, it remains unclear whether this stimulation approach could translate to real-life settings. Methods We present a fully remote, randomized, cross-over trial in healthy adults aged 62–78 years (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03420677). We assessed slow wave activity as the primary outcome and sleep architecture and daily functions, e.g., vigilance and mood as secondary outcomes, after a two-week mobile auditory slow wave stimulation period and a two-week Sham period, interleaved with a two-week washout period. Participants were randomized in terms of which intervention condition will take place first using a blocked design to guarantee balance. Participants and experimenters performing the assessments were blinded to the condition. Results Out of 33 enrolled and screened participants, we report data of 16 participants that received identical intervention. We demonstrate a robust and significant enhancement of slow wave activity on the group-level based on two different auditory stimulation approaches with minor effects on sleep architecture and daily functions. We further highlight the existence of pronounced inter- and intra-individual differences in the slow wave response to auditory stimulation and establish predictions thereof. Conclusions While slow wave enhancement in healthy older adults is possible in fully remote settings, pronounced inter-individual differences in the response to auditory stimulation exist. Novel personalization solutions are needed to address these differences and our findings will guide future designs to effectively deliver auditory sleep stimulations using wearable technology.
Microsoft Kinect is widely used for tracking human body in a range of applications. Although Kinect for Xbox One allows for multiuser tracking, it is not possible to use it in large spaces due to its limited range. Hence, using multiple Kinect sensors for large environments seems to be an appropriate solution. Thus, it is important to know if multiple sensors can be used simulatanously for such applications without interfering with each other. In this paper, we investigate the effect of using multiple Kinects on each other by performing multiple measurements in different settings. Our results show that some occasional interference might happen in some specific constellations, when the sensors are facing the same target. Our recommendation is to avoid such constellations, or to perform a simple interference measurement before using multiple sensors in specific settings.
In epidemiological studies related to winter sports, especially alpine skiing, an unresolved methodological challenge is the quantification of actual on-snow activity exposure. Such information would be relevant for reporting meaningful measures of injury incidence, which refers to the number of new injuries that occur in a given population and time period. Accordingly, accurate determination of the denominator, i.e., actual “activity exposure time”, is critical for injury surveillance and reporting. In this perspective article, we explore the question of whether wearable sensors in combination with mHealth applications are suitable tools to accurately quantify the periods in a ski day when the skier is physically skiing and not resting or using a mechanical means of transport. As a first proof of concept, we present exemplary data from a youth competitive alpine skier who wore his smartphone with embedded sensors on his body on several ski days during one winter season. We compared these data to self-reported estimates of ski exposure, as used in athletes' training diaries. In summary, quantifying on-snow activity exposure in alpine skiing using sensor data from smartphones is technically feasible. For example, the sensors could be used to track ski training sessions, estimate the actual time spent skiing, and even quantify the number of runs and turns made as long as the smartphone is worn. Such data could be very useful in determining actual exposure time in the context of injury surveillance and could prove valuable for effective stress management and injury prevention in athletes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.