Nail technicians are exposed to volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from nail products, but no studies have previously measured VOC biomarkers for these workers. This study of 10 nail technicians aimed to identify VOCs in nail salons and explore relationships between air concentrations and biomarkers. Personal and area air samples were collected using thermal desorption tubes during a work shift and analyzed using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) for 71 VOCs. Whole blood samples were collected pre‐shift and post‐shift, and analyzed using GC/MS for 43 VOCs. Ventilation rates were determined using continuous CO2 measurements. Predominant air VOC levels were ethyl methacrylate (median 240 µg/m3), methyl methacrylate (median 205 µg/m3), toluene (median 100 µg/m3), and ethyl acetate (median 639 µg/m3). Blood levels were significantly higher post‐shift than pre‐shift for toluene (median pre‐shift 0.158 µg/L and post‐shift 0.360 µg/L) and ethyl acetate (median pre‐shift <0.158 µg/L and post‐shift 0.510 µg/L); methacrylates were not measured in blood because of their instability. Based on VOCs measured in these seven nail salons, we estimated that emissions from Greater Boston area nail salons may contribute to ambient VOCs. Ventilation rates did not always meet the ASHRAE guideline for nail salons. There is a need for changes in nail product formulation and better ventilation to reduce VOC occupational exposures.
Studies of human exposure to petroleum (crude oil and fuel) often involve monitoring volatile monoaromatic compounds because of their toxicity and prevalence. Monoaromatic compounds such as benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX) associated with these sources have been well studied and have established reference concentrations (RfC) and reference doses (RfD). However, BTEX exposure levels for the general population are primarily from tobacco smoke, where smokers have blood levels up to 8 times higher on average than nonsmokers. Therefore, in assessing petroleum exposure, it is essential to identify exposure to tobacco smoke as well as other types of smoke exposure (e.g., cannabis, wood) because many smoke volatile organic compounds are also found in petroleum products such as crude oil, and fuel. This work describes a method using partition theory and artificial neural network (ANN) pattern recognition to accurately categorize exposure source based on BTEX and 2,5-dimethylfuran blood levels. For this evaluation three categories were created and include crude oil/fuel, other/nonsmoker, and smoker. A method for using surrogate signatures (i.e., relative VOC levels derived from the source material) to train the ANN was investigated where blood levels among cigarette smokers from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) were compared with signatures derived from machine-generated cigarette smoke. Use of surrogate signatures derived from machine-generated cigarette smoke did provide a sufficient means with which to train the ANN. As a result, surrogate signatures were used for assessing crude oil/fuel exposure because there is limited blood level data on individuals exposed to either crude oil or fuel. Classification agreement between using an ANN model trained with relative VOC levels and using the 2,5-dimethylfuran smoking biomarker cutpoint blood level of 0.014 ng/mL was up to 99.8 % for nonsmokers and 100.0% for smokers. For the NHANES 2007–08 data, the ANN model using a probability cutpoint above 0.5 assigned 7 samples out of 1998 (0.35%) to the crude oil/fuel signature category. For the NHANES 2013–14 data, 12 out of 2906 samples (0.41%) were assigned to the crude oil/fuel signature category. This approach using ANN makes it possible to quickly identify individuals with blood levels consistent with a crude oil/fuel surrogate among thousands of results while minimizing confounding from smoke. Use of an ANN fixed algorithm makes it possible to objectively compare across populations eliminating classification inconsistency that can result from relying on visual evaluation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.