Immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients with decreased graft function and severe histological vascular changes can be particularly challenging. Belatacept could be a valuable option, as a rescue therapy in this context. We report a retrospective case control study comparing a CNI to belatacept switch in 17 patients with vascular damage and low eGFR to a control group of 18 matched patients with CNI continuation. Belatacept switch was performed on average 51.5 months after kidney transplantation (6.2-198 months). There was no difference between the two groups regarding eGFR at inclusion, and 3 months before inclusion. In the "CNI to belatacept switch group," mean eGFR increased significantly from 23.5 ± 6.7 mL/min/1.73m on day 0, to 30.4 ± 9.1 mL/min/1.73 m on month 6 (p < 0.001) compared to the control group, in which no improvement was observed. These results were still significant on month 12. Two patients experienced biopsy-proven acute rejection. One was effectively treated without belatacept discontinuation. Two patients needed belatacept discontinuation for infection. In conclusion, the remplacement of CNI with belatacept in patients with decreased allograft function and vascular lesions is associated with an improvement in eGFR.
Non-transplanted and transplanted patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) differ in terms of mortality and the risk of clinical events. This difference is probably due to the difference of both traditional and non-traditional risk factors. Uremic retention solutes may constitute important non-traditional risk factors in this population. In the present review, we selected a set of uremic toxins that have been associated with harmful effects, and are an appealing target for adjuvant therapy in CKD. For each toxin reviewed here, relevant studies were selected and the relationship with hard clinical outcomes of uremic toxins were compared between non-transplanted CKD patients and transplanted patients taking into account the level of glomerular filtration rate in these two situations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.