Distributed within the laterodorsal tegmental and pedunculopontine tegmental nuclei (LDT and PPT), cholinergic neurons in the pontomesencephalic tegmentum have long been thought to play a critical role in stimulating cortical activation during waking (W) and paradoxical sleep (PS, also called REM sleep), yet also in promoting PS with muscle atonia. However, the discharge profile and thus precise roles of the cholinergic neurons have remained uncertain because they lie intermingled with GABAergic and glutamatergic neurons, which might also assume these roles. By applying juxtacellular recording and labeling in naturally sleeping-waking, head-fixed rats, we investigated the discharge profiles of histochemically identified cholinergic, GABAergic, and glutamatergic neurons in the LDT, SubLDT, and adjoining medial part of the PPT (MPPT) in relation to sleep-wake states, cortical activity, and muscle tone. We found that all cholinergic neurons were maximally active during W and PS in positive correlation with fast (␥) cortical activity, as "W/PS-max active neurons." Like cholinergic neurons, many GABAergic and glutamatergic neurons were also "W/PS-max active." Other GABAergic and glutamatergic neurons were "PS-max active," being minimally active during W and maximally active during PS in negative correlation with muscle tone. Conversely, some glutamatergic neurons were "W-max active," being maximally active during W and minimally active during PS in positive correlation with muscle tone. Through different discharge profiles, the cholinergic, GABAergic, and glutamatergic neurons of the LDT, SubLDT, and MPPT thus appear to play distinct roles in promoting W and PS with cortical activation, PS with muscle atonia, or W with muscle tone.
Multiple lines of evidence indicate that neurons within the pontomesencephalic tegmentum are critically involved in the generation of paradoxical sleep (PS). From single-unit recording studies, evidence suggests that unidentified but "possibly" cholinergic tegmental neurons discharge at higher rates during PS than during slow wave sleep or even waking and would thus play an active role, whereas "presumed" monoaminergic neurons cease firing during PS and would thus play a permissive role in PS generation. In the present study performed on rats, c-Fos immunostaining was used as a reflection of neuronal activity and combined with immunostaining for choline acetyltransferase (ChAT), serotonin (Ser), tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), or glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) for immunohistochemical identification of active neurons during PS recovery ( approximately 28% of recording time) as compared with PS deprivation (0%) and PS control (approximately 15%) conditions. With PS recovery, there was a significant increase in ChAT+/c-Fos+ cells, a significant decrease in Ser+/c-Fos+ and TH+/c-Fos+ cells, and a significant increase in GAD+/c-Fos+ cells. Across conditions, the percent PS was correlated positively with tegmental cholinergic c-Fos+ cells, negatively with raphe serotonergic and locus coeruleus noradrenergic c-Fos+ cells, and positively with codistributed and neighboring GABAergic c-Fos+ cells. These results support the hypothesis that cholinergic neurons are active, whereas monoaminergic neurons are inactive during PS. They moreover indicate that GABAergic neurons are active during PS and could thus be responsible for inhibiting neighboring monoaminergic neurons that may be essential in the generation of PS.
In recent years, GABAergic neurons have been identified in the basal forebrain where cholinergic cortically projecting neurons are located and known to be important in mechanisms of cortical activation. In the present study in the rat, the relationship of the GABA-synthesizing neurons to the acetylcholine-synthesizing neurons was examined by application of a sequential double staining immunohistochemical procedure involving the peroxidase-antiperoxidase technique for glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) and choline acetyltransferase (ChAT). In these double and adjacent single immunostained series of sections, the GAD+ and ChAT+ cells were mapped, counted and measured with the aid of a computerized image analysis system. Through the entire basal forebrain, there was no evidence for colocalization of GAD and ChAT in the same neurons. Instead, a large population of GAD-immunoreactive neurons is codistributed with ChAT-immunoreactive neurons and outnumbers them by a factor of two: approximately 39,000 GAD+ cells to 18,000 ChAT+ cells. Although the GAD+ and ChAT+ neurons lie intermingled within fascicles of the major longitudinal and transverse forebrain fiber systems in subregions of the basal forebrain, the GAD+ cells are more highly concentrated within different sectors of the pathways and regions than the ChAT+ cells. Although GAD+ neurons resemble ChAT+ neurons in certain regions, both being bi- or multipolar and, on average, medium-sized cells, the GAD+ neurons are, in the majority (51%), small-sized cells (< 15 microns in length) and as a population significantly smaller than the ChAT+ neurons. These results suggest that many GABAergic neurons may represent interneurons in the basal forebrain and potentially exert an inhibitory influence on adjacent cortically projecting cholinergic neurons. Medium- to large GAD+ cells, which resemble similar ChAT+ cells, are also present and represent the majority of the GAD+ cells in the nucleus of the diagonal band of Broca, magnocellular preoptic nucleus, and olfactory tubercle, but represent the minority in the anterior and posterior substantia innominata and globus pallidus. Given their prominent size, such GABAergic cells may also exert an inhibitory influence outside the basal forebrain as projection neurons and potentially in parallel with cholinergic neurons, to certain regions of the cerebral cortex. Accordingly, GABAergic cells may be considered as constituents of the magnocellular basal nucleus and potentially important elements within the ventral extrathalamic relay from the brainstem reticular formation to the cerebral cortex.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.