No abstract

BackgroundAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a common neurodevelopmental disorder characterised by the symptoms of inattention, impulsivity and hyperactivity. ADHD was once perceived as a condition of childhood only; however increasing evidence has highlighted the existence of ADHD in older adolescents and adults. Estimates for the prevalence of ADHD in adults range from 2.5–4%. Few data exist on the prescribing trends of the stimulants methylphenidate and dexamfetamine, and the non-stimulant atomoxetine in the UK. The aim of this study was to investigate the annual prevalence and incidence of pharmacologically treated ADHD in children, adolescents and adults in UK primary care.MethodsThe Health Improvement Network (THIN) database was used to identify all patients aged over 6 years with a diagnosis of ADHD/hyperkinetic disorder and a prescription for methylphenidate, dexamfetamine or atomoxetine from 2003–2008. Annual prevalence and incidence of pharmacologically treated ADHD were calculated by age category and sex.ResultsThe source population comprised 3,529,615 patients (48.9% male). A total of 118,929 prescriptions were recorded for the 4,530 patients in the pharmacologically treated ADHD cohort during the 6-year study. Prevalence (per 1000 persons in the mid-year THIN population) increased within each age category from 2003 to 2008 [6–12 years: from 4.8 (95% CI: 4.5–5.1) to 9.2 (95% CI: 8.8–9.6); 13–17 years: from 3.6 (95% CI: 3.3–3.9) to 7.4 (95% CI: 7.0–7.8); 18–24 years: from 0.3 (95% CI: 0.2–0.3) to 1.1 (95% CI: 1.0–1.3); 25–45 years: from 0.02 (95% CI: 0.01–0.03) to 0.08 (95% CI: 0.06–0.10); >45 years: from 0.01 (95% CI: 0.00–0.01) to 0.02 (95% CI: 0.01–0.03). Whilst male patients aged 6-12 years had the highest prevalence; the relative increase in prescribing was higher amongst female patients of the same age - the increase in prevalence in females aged 6–12 years was 2.1 fold compared to an increase of 1.9 fold for their male counterparts. Prevalence of treated ADHD decreased with increasing age. Incidence (per 1000 persons at risk in the mid-year THIN population) was highest for children aged 6–12 years.ConclusionsA trend of increasing prescribing prevalence of ADHD drug treatment was observed over the period 2003–2008. Prevalence of prescribing to adult patients increased; however the numbers treated are much lower than published estimates of the prevalence of ADHD. This study has added to the limited knowledge on ADHD prescribing in primary care, particularly in the area of drug treatment in adulthood.

Drug-related problems were common in the hospitalised children in this study; the most frequent were dosing problems and drug choice problems; the majority of them were preventable. Polypharmacy and transferred admission (another hospital or ward) were potential risk factors. To improve prescribing practices and minimise the risk of DRPs in hospitalised children, paediatric pharmacology and pharmacotherapy are important in medical education.

A drug-related problem (DRP) is 'an event or circumstance involving drug therapy that actually or potentially interferes with the desired health outcome'. The extent and characteristics of DRPs in children in Hong Kong are unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the epidemiology of and identify risk factors for DRPs in hospitalized children in Hong Kong. METHODSThis was a prospective cohort study in children aged 0-18 years who were admitted to a medical ward, paediatric intensive care unit or neonatal intensive care unit of seven Hong Kong hospitals, during a 3 month period. Patients' charts, medical records and laboratory data were reviewed daily to identify DRPs; their preventability and severity were assessed. Logistic regression was used to analyse potential risk factors associated with the incidence of DRPs. RESULTSThree hundred and twenty-nine children (median age, 2 years; interquartile range, 0 months to 9 years) were included. In total, 82 DRPs were experienced by 69 patients. The overall incidence of DRPs was 21.0% (95% confidence interval, 16.7-25.8%). The incidence was higher in neonatal and paediatric intensive care units than medical wards. Dosing problems were the most frequently reported DRPs (n = 35; 42.7%), followed by drug choice problems (n = 19; 23.2%) and adverse drug reactions (n = 11; 13.4%). Sixty-seven (81.7%) DRP cases were assessed as preventable, 42 (51.2%) as minor and 40 (48.8%) as moderate. The number of prescribed drugs and 'certain infectious and parasitic diseases' were potential risk factors for occurrence of DRPs. CONCLUSIONSDrug-related problems were common in hospitalized children in this study in Hong Kong; the most frequent were dosing and drug choice problems, and the majority of them were preventable. Polypharmacy and 'certain infectious and parasitic diseases' were potential risk factors. WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT• The incidence of drug-related problems (DRPs) in hospitalized paediatric patients from countries other than Hong Kong is as high as 45.2%.• Dosing and drug choice problems are the most frequent DRPs in children.• There is no published research regarding the incidence and nature of DRPs in Hong Kong hospitalized children. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS• The incidence of DRPs is as high as 21.0% (95% confidence interval, 16.7-25.8%) in children hospitalized in Hong Kong.• Of the DRPs in hospitalized children in Hong Kong, 81.7% were deemed preventable.• The number of prescribed drugs per patient (five or more) and 'certain infectious and parasitic diseases' increased the risk of occurrence of DRPs.

Summary:Purpose: To examine the safety of lamotrigine (LTG) used in general practice to treat epilepsy.Methods: Information was collected on 11,316 patients who were included in a noninterventional observational cohort study conducted by means of Prescription-Event Monitoring (PEM). A follow-up study provided information on the first 3,994 patients who had taken LTG for 3 6 months. Incidence density (ID) measurements were used to rank the frequency of the reported events.Results: Rash was the most frequently reported nonepileptiform event (ID, 19.7/1,000 patient-months) in the first month of treatment and resulted in LTG being stopped in 2% of the 11,316 patients. Rash was reported more frequently among children aged 2-12 years (ID, 29.4/1,000 patient-months) than adults. Other events associated with the use of LTG included headache, drowsiness, nausea, vomiting, malaise, and lassitude.Rare serious events possibly associated with LTG included 12 cases reported as Stevens-Johnson syndrome, four cases of neutropenia, three cases of thrombocytopenia, and two cases of disseminated intravascular coagulation. There were also individual cases of leucopenia, a meningitic reaction, acute renal failure, hepatotoxicity, and a "lupus-like'' reaction possibly associated with the drug. No foetal abnormalities were specifically associated with the use of the drug in pregnancy. No death was attributed to LTG.Conclusions: Patients had severe epilepsy, inadequately controlled by other antiepileptic agents. The results of these two studies suggest that LTG is acceptably safe when used for the treatment of refractory epilepsy. Key Words: LamotrigineEpilepsy-Drug safety-Prescription-Event MonitoringRash.Lamotrigine (LTG) is a relatively new antiepileptic agent (AED) initially licensed as add-on therapy for seizures inadequately controlled by other drugs. LTG is therefore usually prescribed for patients with chronic, severe epilepsy, already being treated by other agents. The safety of LTG in these patients is of importance to both neurologists and general practitioners (GPs).A study was conducted by Prescription-Event Monitoring (PEM) to establish the safety of LTG. PEM identified events over an observation period of -6 months. As LTG is routinely intended for long-term use, a follow-up study was carried out to identify long-latency events in those patients who took the drug for >6 months.We report the results of the PEM study and the follow-up study.