The goal of this study was to develop a method of friction testing utilizing cartilage counter surfaces with a complete subchondral bone plate and compare the results to the cartilage on glass and metal (steel) counter surfaces. Articular cartilage surfaces with the underlying subchondral bone intact were not isolated through plug removal. Friction testing was completed using a tribometer (n=16). The coefficient of friction (COF) was measured between the proximal articular surfaces of the second carpal bone when brought into contact with the articular surface of the distal radial facet. The COF of the distal radial facet was obtained with glass and metal counter surfaces. Cartilage-cartilage interfaces yielded the lowest COF when a normal force of 5N and 10N was applied. No statistically significant increase in COF was noted for any combination when an increased normal force was applied (10N), although an increase was observed when glass and metal was in contact with cartilage. COF significantly increased when comparing the cartilage counter surface to metal under an applied load of 5N (p=0.0002). When a 10N load was applied, a significant increase in the COF was observed when comparing the cartilage counter surface to both the glass and metal counter surfaces (p=0.0123 and p < 0.0001 respectively). Results have shown that the described methodology was accurate, repeatable, and emulates physiologic conditions when determining the friction coefficient. The determined COF of cartilage against cartilage is significantly lower than cartilage against metal or glass.

OBJECTIVE To determine the following: (1) whether an irrigation solution that is hyperosmolar (HYPER) relative to synovial fluid decreases tissue extravasation during an arthroscopic protocol when compared to a relatively hypoosmolar solution, (2) the safety of a HYPER solution based on viability of joint tissues following joint irrigation, and (3) if the use of a HYPER solution decreases water content in stifle joint tissue. ANIMALS 8 adult horses. PROCEDURES A prospective, blinded, randomized controlled trial was performed to compare lactated Ringer’s solution (LRS; 273 mOsm/L) and a HYPER (600 mOsm/L) irrigation solution for routine medial femorotibial joint (MFTJ) arthroscopy. Primary outcomes included quantification of periarticular fluid retention based on measured changes in defined stifle joint girth and ultrasonographic (US) criteria. Water content of tissue samples was assessed. The viability of articular cartilage was determined using a microscopic fluorescent cell viability staining system. RESULTS No significant difference in postprocedural joint swelling was observed between LRS and HYPER treatment groups. Percent increments in femorotibial joint dimensions (mean ± SD) were seen in both treatment groups based on US (LRS, 83.9 ± 84.6%; HYPER, 131.2 ± 144.9%) and caliper measurements (LRS 5.5 ± 4.3%; HYPER 7.5 ± 5.8%) (P ≤ .05). Chondrocyte viability and tissue water content were maintained in both treatment groups, and differences were not statistically significant. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Doubling the osmolarity of an irrigation solution used routinely for arthroscopy does not result in detrimental effects on chondrocyte viability or tissue water content. However, use of a relatively HYPER irrigation solution did not attenuate procedural tissue swelling of the equine stifle joint.