No abstract

Background: Anxiety is common after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and has the potential to negatively affect physical and psychosocial recovery. There have been no cross-cultural comparisons of anxiety among AMI patients. Aims: To evaluate whether anxiety after AMI differs across five diverse countries and to determine whether an interaction between country, and sociodemographic and clinical variables contributes to variations in reporting anxiety. Methods and Results: A total of 912 individuals with confirmed AMI were enrolled in this prospective, comparative, cross-cultural study. Anxiety was assessed within 72 h of hospital admission using the Brief Symptom Inventory. The mean level of anxiety in the entire sample was 0.62"0.76, which is 44% higher than the normal mean level. Anxiety levels were not significantly different among the countries with the exception that patients in England reported lower levels of anxiety than those in the US (Ps0.03). However, this difference disappeared after controlling for sociodemographic variables on which the countries differed. Conclusion: Patients from each country studied experienced high anxiety after AMI. Even though various cultures were represented in this study, culture itself did not account for variations in anxiety after AMI. It appears that anxiety after AMI is a universal phenomenon.

BACKGROUND: Fever in critically ill patients is often treated with antipyretics or physical cooling methods. Although fever is a host defense response that may benefit some critically ill patients, others may not tolerate the cardiovascular demands associated with fever. OBJECTIVES: To compare antipyretics and physical cooling for their effects on core body temperature and cardiovascular responses in critically ill patients. METHODS: The antipyretic administered was 650 mg of acetaminophen. Physical cooling was accomplished by anterior placement of a cooling blanket at 18 degrees C. Core temperature and cardiovascular responses were measured in 14 febrile (body temperature, 38.8 degrees C) critically ill patients at baseline before treatment and up to 3 hours after treatment. Patients able to receive acetaminophen were randomly assigned to receive either acetaminophen only (n = 5) or acetaminophen in combination with a cooling blanket (n = 3). Patients not able to receive acetaminophen were treated with physical cooling only (n = 6). RESULTS: Mean body temperature decreased minimally from baseline to 3 hours after treatment in the physical-cooling-only group (from 39.1 degrees C to 39.0 degrees C) and in the physical cooling and acetaminophen group (from 39.1 degrees C to 38.6 degrees C), but the mean body temperature increased in the acetaminophen-only group (from 39.2 degrees C to 39.4 degrees C). Other notable findings included a slight increase in systemic vascular resistance index in the physical-cooling-only group and in the physical-cooling-plus-acetaminophen group. CONCLUSIONS: Although the study included only 14 subjects, the findings will provide information for future studies in febrile critically ill patients.

No abstract

Nontraumatic abdominal pain is a common complaint of adult patients in acute care settings. The causes of abdominal pain are numerous and can be benign or life threatening. The advanced practice nurse must be able to differentiate abdominal pain from acute and nonacute sources so that rapid and effective treatment can be implemented.