C ompetition in the current marketplace requires businesses to provide consumers with the utmost convenience in purchasing services and goods. Buyers expect that, as an aftersales service and risk reliever, they can "return" goods if they are not satisfied with them. Such product returns significantly influence retailers' profits not only because of a reduction in net sales but also because of increased costs. Despite its substantial impact, research focused on retailer-consumer return policies has been limited. To fill this gap, we study a retailer that has to set the product return policy parameters-specifically, the price and the return period. The impact of these parameters on consumers' valuation function is also taken into account. We study the model analytically and provide insights through various numerical examples. We find that even with fraudulent consumers' negative effect on sales, a retailer could expect both its profits and prices to increase with an optimally determined return policy. We also find that a retailer that operates in an environment where consumers are not sensitive to return policies should be cautious when setting the return period.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.