No abstract

The article reveals the essence of the categories “harm”, “damage” and “loss”, based on the fact that they are fundamentally different: harm is caused, damage is expressed, losses serve as a method of compensation, when it is impossible or undesirable to compensate in kind. The author concludes that harm and damage is something that is always in the property sphere of the victim, while losses can change their affiliation as a provision under a tort obligation.

No abstract

An analysis of problems occurring during the application of civil liability in legal relationships using information and communication technologies is being conducted in this scientific research. Apart from the absence of legal norms, there are conflict-of-laws rules, contradictions in which are to be resolved. The research of the turnover using digital technologies takes a big part in the legal doctrine. It must be noted that several fundamental works have appeared that make it possible to create a harmonious and non-contradictory system of legal regulation. However, there are still some unresolved questions left; for instance, ones concerning the mechanism of legal regulation of civil liability of subjects that have entered relations using digital technologies. The analysis of the civil law doctrine, the propositions of current Russian and international legislations, and legal practice have revealed a complex of problems connected to the civil liability of subjects entering legal relations using information and communication technologies. It became possible to systemize them depending on the subject and their role in the initiation or termination of the relation. A range of methods (general, general scientific and legal) has made it possible to make conclusions about the reasons why legal regulation is imperfect and why conflicts exist (to prevent them from happening in the future), formulate a legal regime of liability of subjects of the main or supporting group, suggest alterations to the current Russian legislation, aimed at bringing the owner of the information system to account.

The formation of the spectrum of global economic and political challenges for Russia is a factor in returning the issues of economic modernization to the public administration agenda, taking into account the current state and development trends of the country's economy as a whole and its regions. As a research tool, the system method and the method of statistical observations are used. In Russia, the role of the state in regulating economic processes and its predominance in the structure of Russian economy remains significant. All this makes it necessary to consider the participation of the state in the process of modernization transformations. The article discusses the historical experience of modernization in developed countries with significant state participation, as well as modern Russian goals of state participation in economy, the role of the relevant policy in achieving the goals of modernization (on the example of the "May Decree" of the President of the Russian Federation of May 7, 2018), its contingency with the practices and role of big business as an integral part of the modernization process. The paper suggests ways to optimize public policy in the direction of modernization, taking into account the priorities formulated for the management system.