In the Drosophila embryo, Nanos and Pumilio collaborate to repress the translation of hunchback mRNA in the somatic cytoplasm. Both proteins are also required for repression of maternal Cyclin B mRNA in the germline; it has not been clear whether they act directly on Cyclin B mRNA, and if so, whether regulation in the presumptive somatic and germline cytoplasm proceeds by similar or fundamentally different mechanisms. In this report, we show that Pumilio and Nanos bind to an element in the 3Ј UTR to repress Cyclin B mRNA. Regulation of Cyclin B and hunchback differ in two significant respects. First, Pumilio is dispensable for repression of Cyclin B (but not hunchback) if Nanos is tethered via an exogenous RNA-binding domain. Nanos probably acts, at least in part, by recruiting the CCR4-Pop2-NOT deadenylase complex, interacting directly with the NOT4 subunit. Second, although Nanos is the sole spatially limiting factor for regulation of hunchback, regulation of Cyclin B requires another Oskar-dependent factor in addition to Nanos. Ectopic repression of Cyclin B in the presumptive somatic cytoplasm causes lethal nuclear division defects. We suggest that a requirement for two spatially restricted factors is a mechanism for ensuring that Cyclin B regulation is strictly limited to the germline.

DNA mismatch repair (MMR) is a multifunctional process that promotes genetic stability and suppresses carcinogenesis. Correction of DNA replication errors is its major function. Despite the importance of MMR, its functioning in eukaryotes is not well understood. Here we report that human mismatch correction reactions in cell-free extracts occur during concomitant nick-dependent nucleosome assembly shaped by the replication histone chaperone CAF-I. Concomitant nucleosome assembly protects the discontinuous mismatch-containing strands from excessive degradation by MMR machinery. Such protection is also demonstrated in a defined purified system that supports both mismatch correction and CAF-I-dependent histone H3–H4 deposition reactions. In addition, we find that the mismatch recognition factor MutSα suppresses CAF-I-dependent histone H3–H4 deposition in a mismatch-dependent manner. We suggest that there is active crosstalk between MMR and replication-dependent nucleosome assembly during the correction of DNA replication errors and, as a result, the nascent mismatch-containing strands are degraded in a controlled manner.

Mutations are a major driving force of evolution and genetic disease. In eukaryotes, mutations are produced in the chromatin environment, but the impact of chromatin on mutagenesis is poorly understood. Previous studies have determined that in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Rtt109-dependent acetylation of histone H3 on K56 is an abundant modification that is introduced in chromatin in S phase and removed by Hst3 and Hst4 in G2/M. We show here that the chromatin deacetylation on histone H3 K56 by Hst3 and Hst4 is required for the suppression of spontaneous gross chromosomal rearrangements, base substitutions, 1-bp insertions/deletions, and complex mutations. The rate of base substitutions in hst3Δ hst4Δ is similar to that in isogenic mismatch repair-deficient msh2Δ mutant. We also provide evidence that H3 K56 acetylation by Rtt109 is important for safeguarding DNA from small insertions/deletions and complex mutations. Furthermore, we reveal that both the deacetylation and acetylation on histone H3 K56 are involved in mutation avoidance mechanisms that cooperate with mismatch repair and the proofreading activities of replicative DNA polymerases in suppressing spontaneous mutagenesis. Our results suggest that cyclic acetylation and deacetylation of chromatin contribute to replication fidelity and play important roles in the protection of nuclear DNA from diverse spontaneous mutations.

MutL proteins are ubiquitous and play important roles in DNA metabolism. MutLγ (MLH1-MLH3 heterodimer) is a poorly understood member of the eukaryotic family of MutL proteins that has been implicated in triplet repeat expansion, but its action in this deleterious process has remained unknown. In humans, triplet repeat expansion is the molecular basis for ∼40 neurological disorders. In addition to MutLγ, triplet repeat expansion involves the mismatch recognition factor MutSβ (MSH2-MSH3 heterodimer). We show here that human MutLγ is an endonuclease that nicks DNA. Strikingly, incision of covalently closed, relaxed loopcontaining DNA by human MutLγ is promoted by MutSβ and targeted to the strand opposite the loop. The resulting strand break licenses downstream events that lead to a DNA expansion event in human cell extracts. Our data imply that the mammalian MutLγ is a unique endonuclease that can initiate triplet repeat DNA expansions.DNA repair | genome instability | MLH3 | endonuclease | triplet repeat expansion diseases

MutLα is a key component of the DNA mismatch repair system in eukaryotes. The DNA mismatch repair system has several genetic stabilization functions. Of these functions, DNA mismatch repair is the major one. The loss of MutLα abolishes DNA mismatch repair, thereby predisposing humans to cancer. MutLα has an endonuclease activity that is required for DNA mismatch repair. The endonuclease activity of MutLα depends on the DQHA(X)2E(X)4E motif which is a part of the active site of the nuclease. This motif is also present in many bacterial MutL and eukaryotic MutLγ proteins, DNA mismatch repair system factors that are homologous to MutLα. Recent studies have shown that yeast MutLγ and several MutL proteins containing the DQHA(X)2E(X)4E motif possess endonuclease activities. Here, we review the endonuclease activities of MutLα and its homologs in the context of DNA mismatch repair.