Objective: A large number of psychosocial interventions in dementia are based on music activities and music therapy interventions. We aim at assessing the efficacy of music therapy in the neuropsychiatric symptoms of people with dementia. Methods: This systematic review is according to the methodology suggested by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. We searched for articles in PubMed, Web of Knowledge Cross Search, Cochrane Library, Scopus and Lilacs/Bireme databases published from 2005 to 2016. The search keywords included "early onset" and "late onset" combined with "dementia", "Alzheimer", "vascular dementia", "mixed dementia", "frontotemporal dementia", "neuropsychiatric symptoms", "behavioral disturbances", "behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia" and "music therapy". The studies were categorized according to its efficacy on the decline of neuropsychiatric symptoms and improvement of cognitive function, quality of life and well-being. Results: We selected 12 out of 257 papers. Music therapy interventions were applied individually or in group setting, using active or receptive technique. In general, studies indicated the efficacy of music therapy on the decline of depression, agitation and anxiety. There were heterogeneity of interventions, methodological design and instruments of evaluation among the studies. Conclusions: Although there are reports of the efficacy of music therapy on the decline of neuropsychiatric symptoms of dementia, the area still needs randomized studies aimed at the solution of important methodological problems like the lack of standardized approaches. RESUMOObjetivo: Muitas intervenções psicossociais na demência estão baseadas em atividades musicais e intervenções de musicoterapia. Nosso objetivo consiste em avaliar a eficácia das intervenções de musicoterapia nos sintomas neuropsiquiátricos de pessoas com demência. Métodos: Esta revisão sistemática está de acordo com a metodologia sugerida pela Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Foi realizada busca por artigos nas bases de dados PubMed, Web of Knowledge Cross Search, Cochrane Library, Scopus e Lilacs/Bireme publicados de 2005 a 2016. As palavras-chave incluíram descritores como "iní-cio precoce" e "início tardio" combinados com "demência", "Alzheimer", "demência vascular", "demência mista", "demência frontotemporal", "sintomas neuropsiquiátricos", "distúrbios com- KeywordsMusic therapy, dementia, neuropsychiatric symptoms. Efficacy of music therapy in dementia portamentais", "sintomas comportamentais e psicológicos da demência", "musicoterapia". Os estudos foram categorizados segundo sua eficácia na redução dos sintomas neuropsiquiá-tricos e na melhora da função cognitiva, qualidade de vida e bem-estar. Resultados: Foram selecionados 12 dos 257 artigos encontrados. As intervenções de musicoterapia foram aplicadas individualmente ou em grupo, utilizando técnica ativa ou receptiva. Em geral, os estudos indicaram a eficácia da musicoterapia na dimin...
Objective: Cognitive, neuropsychiatric and functional deficits are core symptoms of dementia. Non-pharmacological interventions, such as music therapy, when used in conjunction with pharmacological treatment, have the potential to alleviate these symptoms. The purpose of this preliminary study is to examine the active music therapy on cognition and neuropsychiatric symptoms in the elderly with mild and moderate dementia. Methods: The initial sample consisted of outpatients with dementia (N = 15) and their family members or caregivers (N = 15). Two dyads did not complete the assessments before intervention and were excluded from the analysis. Thirteen females (N = 13) comprised the final sampled and were diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease (N = 10), vascular dementia (N = 2) and mixed dementia (N = 1), at mild (N = 11) and moderate (N = 2) dementia stage. Participants were enrolled in an open-label trial of active music therapy group, set to take place once weekly for 60 minutes over a period of 12 weeks. Results: Participants experienced a slight improvement on cognition measured with Mini-Mental State Examination (p = 0.41), although without statistical significance and a statistically significant decrease in anxiety (p = 0.042) in post-intervention. There were no significant effects on quality of life and caregiver burden. Conclusions: Active music therapy is a promising intervention with good acceptance among participants. More studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm its effects and efficacy in cognitive and neuropsychiatric symptoms in dementia.
IntroductionThe finding of prefrontal dysfunction in schizophrenia patients with negative symptoms (NS) has raised interest in using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), which can modulate prefrontal function and dopamine release, as potential treatment for NS.ObjectiveTo briefly review current literature concerning the use of TMS as treatment for NS.AimsTo assess whether current evidence supports the use of TMS for NS.MethodsNarrative review of articles found through a PubMed database search using the keywords “transcranial magnetic stimulation”, “schizophrenia”, and “negative symptoms” between 1998 and 2015.ResultsUp to date, reviews of randomized sham-controlled studies found positive effects of TMS in NS. However, they exposed several methodological difficulties. More recent studies, reviewed in this poster, tried to overcome these, using results from multiple centers, larger samples and blinding. Various TMS techniques were studied, differing in frequency, motor threshold (MT), stimulus location, and treatment duration. Overall, TMS continues to show promising results in reducing NS; particularly rTMS 10 Hz, for at least 15 sessions on the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) at a 110% MT.ConclusionsTMS may be a useful treatment for NS for patients not responding to pharmacological treatment alone. Studies remain difficult to compare due to different measures of outcome (PANSS and SANS being the most commonly used) and techniques. Furthermore, possible modulators of response include duration of illness, cognitive symptoms amelioration, medication and their dose, and different NS may respond differently to TMS. More studies are needed to better understand the utility of TMS in NS.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.
IntroductionRepetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS), through modulation of cortical activity, has become an invaluable tool in experimental and clinical neurosciences. Although this form of noninvasive treatment is considered safer than other means of brain stimulation it has been associated with adverse effects (AE).ObjectiveTo make a brief review, concerning the AE of rTMS, their prevention and management.AimsTo understand and be able to deal with the most common AE associated with rTMS.MethodsA PubMed database search, using as keywords “Transcranial magnetic stimulation”, “Repetitive Transcranial magnetic stimulation”; “adverse effects”; “management” and “guidelines” between the year 1998 and 2015.ResultsAE caused by rTMS are rare. They can be classified into severe (seizures) and mild (syncope, and transient hearing impairment, acute psychiatric changes, headache, local pain, neck pain, toothache, paresthesia and cognitive/neuropsychological changes) and into early and late AE. In order to obviate and avoid them, guidelines have been created; some state that to apply rTMS the technician needs to obtain the patient's informed consent and assess the risks/benefit ratio. To meet these criteria, screening tools have been created, and since then the number of AE has reduced.ConclusionsEven though rTMS is considered safer than other forms of brain stimulation it is still associated with AE. In order to avoid them, screening tools have been created allowing the clinician to assess the risks and benefits of applying this technique.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.
IntroductionClinical concepts regarding atypical psychosis such as the French bouffeé délirante, the German cycloid psychosis, and the Scandinavian reactive and schizophreniform psychoses are now under the category of F23 ‘Acute and transient psychotic disorders’ (ATPD) of the tenth revision of the International Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders (ICD-10).AimsThe authors’ aim is to highlight the clinical and scientific relevance of atypical psychosis from the historical concepts to the current perspective.MethodsA Pubmed database search using as keywords “atypical psychosis”, “acute and transient psychotic disorders”, and “brief psychotic disorder” and retrieved papers were selected according to their relevance.ResultsDifferent psychiatric schools, often of a regional or national character, have provided concepts for transient psychotic states. The acute and transient psychotic disorders of ICD-10 and the brief psychotic disorder of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) reflect the diversity of the history of such concepts. The available evidence suggests that case identification and follow-up is difficult in ATPD due to the heterogeneous and infrequent nature of this clinical phenomenon. Furthermore ATPD has a low diagnostic stability and there are few studies focused on brief psychotic disorders.ConclusionsThe present definition of acute and transient psychotic disorders and brief psychotic disorder, while taking into account the history of the concepts involved, leave many questions open to further studies.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.