Source rocks on‐structure in the October field are not sufficiently mature to have expelled hydrocarbons at the present day. l‐D modelling of a pseudo‐well in the deep October South Trough demonstrates that the Eocene Thebes and Senonian Sudr Formations are presently mature at depths greater than 3km. However, only the carbonate‐rich Sudr Formation has generated sufficient hydrocarbons for expulsion to take place at depths shallower than 3.5km, suggesting that reservoired oil in the October field originates predominantly from source rocks of this unit. Model results indicate that hydrocarbon expulsion from this source may have commenced as early as 20Ma in kitchen depocentres adjacent to the October field, and continued through the Pliocene. Migration routes predicted from 2‐D modelling are complex and require downward expulsion from the Sudr Formation east and west of the October field to charge the Palaeozoic Nubian Sandstone. Mature Sudr Formation in the October South Trough first charges the Nubian and then lower Senonian Matulla Formation reservoirs in the NW compartments of the October field via flow across the NW bounding fault. The mature Sudr Formation in the Baba Trough to the SE charged the Matulla Sandstones on the eastern flanks of the October field which then back‐filled to spill into the Nubian Sandstones. Hydrocarbons generated from the Thebes Formation contribute only minor volumes to the predicted accumulations. The presence of trap‐bounding faults and their sealing properties is shown to be a key sensitivity for charging the October field and related structures. Fault seal is required to charge known accumulations and match known hydrocarbon column heights, but extending shale smear into the Nubian Sandstone prevents the crestal October field structure from charging. The Matulla Formation sandstones are a regional migration fairway providing charge for the Ras Budran field and Nubian Sandstone prospects to the west of the October field. Younger Mesozoic sandstones are charged by vertical migration through seals and along faults. This regional migration sequence as described for the October field is likely to Maher Ayyad of BG Egypt very kindly gave access to the seismic cross section used in the study, as well as guiding our understanding of the regional geology of the Gulf of Suez, and also provided a constructive review of the manuscript. EGPC generously provided access to well data and support for Magdi El‐Ghamri. Colin Harwood (BG Group) and Dan Carruthers and John Bunney (Permedia Research Group Inc.) commented on early drafts of the manuscript. BG Group is thanked for permission to publish.

A collection of 14 crude oil samples representing 13 giant oil fields from the prerift and synrift reservoirs of the Gulf of Suez province were analyzed for C7 light hydrocarbons. The light hydrocarbon parameters C7 star plot diagrams in conjunction with the biomarker characteristics differences were used to distinguish the Gulf of Suez into two oil groups, the prerift and synrift oils, which are predominantly source related and maturity dependent. The biomarker properties indicate that the prerift oils exhibit oleanane index <8%, and higher gammacerane index >23%, while the synrift oils are characterized by relatively higher oleanane index around 30% and low gammacerane index values <10%. The prerift oils are correlated with the Upper Cretaceous Brown Limestone and Sudr chalk formations, which are possibly representative of the carbonate-rich marine source rocks of type II kerogen. The synrift oils are correlated with Lower Miocene Rudeis siliciclastic source rocks of mixed types II-III kerogen. The prerift and synrift source rocks entered the oil generation window at vitrinite reflectance between 0.7 to 0.9 Ro%, equivalent to formation temperature at 110 • C and 125 • C, which permits the expulsion of mature crude oils to reservoir rocks according to their stratigraphic and structural relations. The higher sterane maturity parameters, i.e., diasterane index, C 29 ααα20S/(S + R), and C 29 αββ/(αββ + ααα), of the prerift oils imply a generation from carbonate rich marine source rocks at a very high maturity level in comparison with the relatively mature siliciclastic source rocks that generated the synrift oils in the Gulf of Suez rift basin.