To compare the effectiveness of two combined non-surgical periodontal therapies from an analysis of the treated tooth surface using optical microscopy (OM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Methods: Thirty patients were selected with moderate to severe periodontal disease and indicating at least one piece for extraction due to poor prognosis. A clinical study with a split-mouth, randomized, double-blind design was performed. Two combined treatment modalities were compared: Cavitron Bobcat ™ + completion with Gracey Curettes (G1); EMS™ + completion with Gracey curettes (G2). The treatment was performed until a smooth surface was obtained and no residual calculus was present, which was verified by a periodontal probe. The extracted pieces were analyzed by OM and SEM. Periodontal variables were: plaque index (PI), bleeding on probing (BP), probing pocket depth (PPD), clinical insertion level (CIL), gingival recession (GR) were observed before treatment, 3 and 6 months later. The operative time (OT) for each method was also analyzed. The results were compared by ANOVA followed by the Tukey test, setting the significance value at p<0.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.