Biphasic CT with mesenteric CT angiography is effective in the diagnosis of AMI.

Ten patients with 11 islet cell tumors underwent dynamic contrast material-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging within a 1-month period. MR imaging depicted all 11 tumors, and CT depicted seven of the 11 tumors. CT did not depict four of seven tumors that measured 2.5 cm in diameter or less. Islet cell tumors had low signal intensity on T1-weighted fat-suppressed MR images, and gastrinomas were best shown with this technique. Two of three insulinomas less than 1.5 cm in diameter were best shown on dynamic contrast-enhanced fast low-angle shot (FLASH) images as uniform areas of high signal intensity. Hepatic metastases were seen in five patients and showed peripheral ringlike enhancement best demonstrated on dynamic gadolinium-enhanced FLASH images. Hepatic lesions were most conspicuous on T2-weighted fat-suppressed spin-echo images. MR imaging with dynamic gadolinium enhancement and fat suppression is a promising tool in the investigation of islet cell tumors.

Dynamic contrast medium-enhanced computed tomography (CT), T2-weighted fat-suppressed spin-echo (T2FS) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and breath-hold T1-weighted fast low-angle shot (FLASH) MR imaging before and after dynamic gadopentetate dimeglumine injection were compared in 73 patients with clinically suspected liver disease. Observer confidence for presence of focal lesions was determined by using receiver operating characteristic analysis. For all MR images, hepatic lesion-liver signal-to-noise ratios were evaluated qualitatively. and resolution and presence of artifacts were evaluated qualitatively. Lesion detection was greatest with T2FS (n = 272) and enhanced FLASH (n = 244) and was statistically greater with both of these than with CT (n = 220) and FLASH (n = 219) (P less than .03). Correct lesion characterization was greatest with enhanced FLASH (n = 236) (P less than .01), followed by CT (n = 199), FLASH (n = 164), and T2FS (n = 144). Enhanced FLASH was particularly successful in characterization of 5-mm- to 1.5-cm-diameter lesions as cystic or solid.

New magnetic resonance (MR) imaging techniques possess features desirable for imaging the pancreas. Computed tomography (CT) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) were prospectively compared with breath-hold fast low-angle shot (FLASH) and fat-suppressed spin-echo techniques before and after enhancement with gadopentetate dimeglumine. Thirty-five patients underwent ERCP, CT, and/or MR imaging studies within a 1-month period. Correlation with surgical findings, histologic findings, or clinical and/or imaging follow-up was obtained in all cases. Quantitative measurements of pancreas, pancreas minus pancreatic lesion, and pancreas minus fat signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) were performed on MR images. The highest measurements of pancreas minus pancreatic tumor SNR were on gadolinium-enhanced, fat-suppressed images (8.9 +/- 3.4). The 1-second postcontrast FLASH images most reliably showed enhancement of normal pancreatic tissue. Nonenhanced FLASH images depicted peripancreatic fluid and inflammatory changes most successfully. The findings from this study suggest MR imaging is effective for imaging inflammatory and neoplastic pancreatic disease and may be superior to CT.

Nonenhanced and gadolinium-enhanced fat-suppressed spin-echo and breath-hold fast low-angle shot (FLASH) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging techniques were compared with iodine contrast material-enhanced computed tomography (CT) for the detection and characterization of renal masses. MR studies included T1-weighted fat-suppressed spin-echo (T1FS) and FLASH images followed by rapid injection of gadopentetate dimeglumine and a repeated FLASH image obtained at 1 second, a T1FS image at 30 seconds, and a FLASH image at 10 minutes. Of 38 patients, 17 had renal cysts, 18 had solid tumors, two had cortical scarring, and one had a hypertrophied column of Bertin. With contrast-enhanced T1FS, contrast-enhanced FLASH, and CT images, 114, 110, and 109 lesions, respectively, were detected. With MR imaging and CT, cysts smaller than 5 mm in diameter and solid tumors as small as 1 cm in diameter were detected. With combined contrast-enhanced FLASH and T1FS images, 112 lesions were correctly characterized as cystic or solid; with nonenhanced T1FS images, 110; with nonenhanced FLASH images, 107; and with nonenhanced CT, 103.