This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Acute aortic syndrome (AAS) is a modern term used to describe interrelated emergency aortic conditions with similar clinical characteristics and challenges including aortic dissection, intramural hematoma (IMH) and penetrating aortic ulcer (PAU). Population-based studies suggest that the incidence of aortic dissection ranges from 2.6 to 3.5 cases per 100,000 inhabitants per year; hypertension and a variety of genetic disorders with altered connective tissue are the most prevalent risk conditions. In general, open surgical repair is recommended when dissection involves the ascending aorta, whereas medical management and endovascular stent graft repair is the best option when the ascending aorta is spared. Pathological conditions involving the aortic arch may be treated using a hybrid approach combining debranching of supra-aortic vessels and stent graft placement. Stent graft-induced remodeling of a dissected aorta seems to have long-term benefits in complicated and so-called uncomplicated type B dissections as almost every case reveals a risk profile and one in eight patients diagnosed with acute type B aortic dissection has either an IMH or a PAU. Pain is the most commonly presenting symptom of AAS and should prompt immediate attention including diagnostic imaging modalities, such as multislice computed tomography, transesophageal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. A specific therapeutic approach is necessary for IMH and PAU because without treatment they have a very poor outcome, are unpredictable in evolution and can be more severe than acute aortic dissection. All patients must receive the best medical treatment available at admission. High-risk but asymptomatic patients with IMH and PAU can probably be monitored without interventions. All symptomatic patients will need treatment. In many of these patients a direct surgical approach is often prohibitive due to age and multiple comorbidities. Endovascular treatment offers superior results and is becoming a recognized indication for such patients. Irrespective of the treatment modality close surveillance is mandatory in order to monitor disease progression.

No abstract

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is the latest intravascular imaging modality for the investigation of coronary arteries. It can be used in patients with stable coronary artery disease as well as in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Its almost microscope-like resolution of 10-20 μm (10-times greater than intravascular ultrasound) gives us the most detailed insight into the coronary artery wall in vivo so far.Optical coherence tomography can be used for accurate qualitative and quantitative assessment of stenoses in stable coronary artery disease and accurate guidance of percutaneous coronary interventions as well as accurate postprocedural control. In patients with acute coronary syndrome it can be used for the detection of culprit of the culprit lesion (vulnerable plaque) which allows the operator to cover not only angiographically tightest stenosis (angiographic culprit lesion, caused in most cases by thrombus only) but most importantly the vulnerable plaque, which led to the acute event, as well. Furthermore, optical coherence tomography allows accurate assessment of thrombotic burden, stent apposition/malapposition, edge dissections and tissue prolaps or thrombus protrusions throught stent struts, etc.