Severe carotid stenosis may be associated with uncommon clinical symptoms. We report a case of ocular ischemic syndrome and subsequent rubeosis iridis due to a high-grade carotid stenosis. The patient recovered visual acuity and his normal iris coloring after carotid endarterectomy. Rubeosis iridis may be the only clinical sign associated with severe carotid stenosis, making it mandatory to rule out the presence of carotid narrowing when it is detected. Establishing an early diagnosis is essential to improve quality of life, prognosis, and patients' outcome.
Introduction The electrophysiologic (EP) evaluation with programmed electrical stimulation (PVS) is generally recommended in patients with repaired Tetralogy of Fallot and additional risk factors for sudden cardiac death. Nevertheless, different PVS protocols have been described. The aim of our study was to evaluate the differences in ventricular tachycardia (VT) inducibility of patients with TOF after the implementation of a standard PVS protocol in the EP laboratory of a Congenital Heart Disease reference center. Methods All patients with repaired TOF who underwent an EP study with PVS between January 2001 and October 2020 were included. The new standardized PVS protocol was performed in 2 ventricular sites (apex and outflow tract) with 3 drive trains (cycle lengths 400, 500 and 600ms) and up to 3 extrastimuli. In absence of VT induction, the protocol was repeated under isoprenaline infusion. This new protocol was implemented since January 2012. Non protocolized PVS studies before 2012 were defined as “Non-standardized”. Baseline clinical information about symptoms and previous arrhythmias was recorded as well as electrocardiogram, echocardiogram and cardiac MRI parameters. Finally, the follow-up events (ICD implantation, sudden cardiac death, global mortality, arrythmias and ICD therapies) were also retrospective recorded. Results A total of 154 EP studies with PVS were performed in 128 patients with repaired TOF. 31 of them were performed before the 1st January 2012 (non-standardized PVS) and 112 were performed with the new standardized protocol. The median follow-up was 6,5 years. Both groups had similar baseline characteristics except LVEF and RVEF, that were lower in the “Non-standardized PVS” group. There were no differences between the ventricular tachycardia inducibility of both protocols (22,3% vs 33,3%; p=0,162). The risk factors for VT inducibility were the QRS length (184,46ms vs 169,34 ms; p=0,038), the RVEF (36,25% vs 43,79; p=0,0007), the presence of ventricular ectopia (VE) (38,5% vs 20,0%; p=0,024) and previous VT (35,9% vs 13,9%; p=0,003). VT induction during EP study was related with ICD implantation (71,8% vs 21,7%, p≤0,001), VT (30,8% vs 20%, p<0,001) and all kind of arrythmias (VT, non-sustained VT, VE and auricular flutter) (41% vs 21,7%, p=0,005) during follow-up. A total of 6 deaths (1 in the group with induced VT and 5 in the group with non-induced VT) were recorded. Conclusions The implementation of a standardized and more complete PVS protocol in patients with repaired TOF has not shown differences in the experience of our center. The risk factors for VT inducibility were the QRS length, the RVEF, the presence of ventricular ectopia and previous VT, which have also been reported as risk factors for sudden cardiac death in previous studies. The presence of VT induction entailed more ICD implantation and more arrythmias at follow-up. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.
Background In the last years a substantial effort has been made to improve the understanding of the sex-differences in cardiovascular disease. However, no studies have examined differences in presentation and outcomes between men and women presenting with syncope and bundle branch block (BBB). Aim To determinate if there are sex-specific differences in the characteristics and outcomes of syncope in patients with BBB Methods Cohort study carried out in a tertiary hospital that is a reference center for syncope from January 2008 to February 2021. Patients (p.) with BBB and syncope of unknown origin after the initial evaluation without direct indication of an ICD were included. They were managed according to the current ESC guidelines. All patients underwent to an EPS and an ILR was implanted if it was not diagnostic. Results 374p. were included (75±1 y. o; 135 (36%) female). Mean follow up was 2.3±1.6 y.o. No differences in baseline characteristics where found comparing both groups, except that LBBB was more prevalent in female and RBBB in male (Figure 1A). EPS and ILR diagnostic yield was 44%/44% respectively in females and 50% /40% in males (p=ns). However, basal HV interval in EPS was significant shorter in females (Figure 2A). In the multivariate analyses female sex was associated with a significant lower risk of AV block (Figure 1B), and with a trend of less need of a pacemaker implantation (PM) (53% in females, 60% in males) (Log-rank 0.1) (Figure 2B). No significant differences in recurrences neither in mortality rate were found. Conclusions Female patients with syncope and BBB have lower risk of AV block compared to males, and only half of them required a pacemaker implantation. A strategy of direct PM implantation should be avoided, specially in woman. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Figure 1Figure 2
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.