Introduction In the context of the Covid-19 pandemic, healthcare workers experienced significant distress. At the same time, concern for the safety and well-being of employees remained important priorities to ensure the quality of care for children with mental illness.ObjectivesTo study the specifics of the experience of the Covid-19 pandemic among employees of a children’s psychiatric clinic, highlight the existing among them attitudes about the pandemic and form administrative decisions to improve the quality of care for children.Methods380 employees voluntarily took part in the study (group 1 (G1): 115 people who worked directly with Covid-19 and group 2 (G2): 265 people without this experience) from 05/18/2020 to 05/20/2020. The author’s questionnaire included the following blocks: 1) attitude towards patients and colleagues; 2) emotional experiences; 3) ways of coping; 4) social support; 4) finance.ResultsThe main motive when deciding to work with Covid-19 was the motive of professional duty (25.4% of participants). There are a number of significant differences between group 1 and group 2: participants in G1 are characterized by denial of special experiences associated with Covid-19, seeking help from colleagues in difficult working conditions, reliance on family members and a positive vision of administrative decisions significantly more than participants G2. Relatives of G1 participants are less concerned about their future and health.ConclusionsThe personnel decisions made on the basis of the research allowed the clinic’s team to provide quality care to children and families throughout the pandemic.

No abstract

IntroductionIn recent years, mental health professionals have faced a lot of difficulties and challenges in their work and often need the help of colleagues themselves.ObjectivesTo study the specifics of self-reflection of mental health professionals in different years (January 2020 - October 2022)MethodsSince 2002, Institute of Integrative Family Therapy has been using an approved registration card, which is filled in and handed over after completion of work by all specialists working with families. The maps contain sections describing the progress of work, hypotheses, system parameters of the family, features of the state of the specialist and clients, and so on. We conducted a content analysis of the cards: in 2020, 531 cards were considered, in 2021 - 390, in 2022 - 464 cards.ResultsThere are differences in the subjective assessment by specialists of their condition over the years. In the description for the section “Themes and questions in family work that elicited strong emotional reactions from the therapist(s”), professionals began to mention their reactions of fear and confusion more often than before. So, in 2020, fear was mentioned by 4 and confusion by 17 specialists, in 2021 - by 5 and 16, in 2022 - by 36 and 121, respectively. In the section related to the reasons for changing the working (systemic) hypothesis, specialists changed the hypothesis more often (in 2020 - in 53 cases, in 2021 - 40, in 2022 - 98). “The degree of satisfaction of the specialist (-s) with the results of working with the family (in points from 1 to 10, where 1 - absolutely not satisfied, 10 - satisfaction exceeded all expectations" was assessed in 2022 by specialists lower than in previous years: the average value in 2020 - 8.8; in 2021 - 8.9; in 2022 - 6.2.ConclusionsSupervision, as a form of professional growth and support from a more experienced colleague, is becoming an indispensable component of the work of a specialist helping families in 2022. Assistance in overcoming “dead end” and advising difficult cases due to the experience of the supervisor, on the one hand, allows specialists to understand the situation, offer alternative hypotheses, teach new interventions, on the other hand, it helps the supervised colleague to reflect on the case, analyze its “blind” zones, understand mistakes and summarize the unique experience gained in the psychotherapy of a “difficult” patient.Disclosure of InterestNone Declared