Summary. Background: The optimal intensity of oral anticoagulation for the prevention of recurrent thrombosis in patients with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome is uncertain. Retrospective studies show that only high‐intensity oral anticoagulation [target international normalized ratio (INR) >3.0] is effective but a recent randomized clinical trial comparing high (INR range 3.0–4.0) vs. moderate (INR 2.0–3.0) intensities of anticoagulation failed to confirm this assumption. Methods: We conducted a randomized trial in which 109 patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and previous thrombosis were given either high‐intensity warfarin (INR range 3.0–4.5, 54 patients) or standard antithrombotic therapy (warfarin, INR range 2.0–3.0 in 52 patients or aspirin alone, 100 mg day−1 in three patients) to determine whether intensive anticoagulation is superior to standard treatment in preventing symptomatic thromboembolism without increasing the bleeding risk. Results: The 109 patients enrolled in the trial were followed up for a median time of 3.6 years. Mean INR during follow‐up was 3.2 (SD 0.6) in the high‐intensity warfarin group and 2.5 (SD 0.3) (P < 0.0001) in the conventional treatment patients given warfarin. Recurrent thrombosis was observed in six of 54 patients (11.1%) assigned to receive high‐intensity warfarin and in three of 55 patients (5.5%) assigned to receive conventional treatment [hazard ratio for the high intensity group, 1.97; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.49–7.89]. Major and minor bleeding occurred in 15 patients (two major) (27.8%) assigned to receive high‐intensity warfarin and eight (three major) (14.6%) assigned to receive conventional treatment (hazard ratio 2.18; 95% CI 0.92–5.15). Conclusions: High‐intensity warfarin was not superior to standard treatment in preventing recurrent thrombosis in patients with APS and was associated with an increased rate of minor hemorrhagic complications.
SummaryThe paper reports on rate and type of thrombotic events occurring during the observational, prospective, inception-cohort, multicenter ISCOAT study. 2,745 unselected, daily practice patients, consecutively referring to 34 Italian anticoagulation clinics to monitor the oral anticoagulant treatment, were included in the study from beginning of their first anticoagulant course. During a total follow-up of 2,011 patient-years of treatment 70 thrombotic events (3.5 per 100 patient years) were recorded in 67 patients: 20 fatal (1%), 39 major (1.9%) and 11 minor (0.6%). 34/70 events occurred within the first 90 days of treatment (relative risk - at multivariate analysis - of <90 days vs. >90 = 20.6, C.I. 12.7-33.5; p <0.0001). The risk was higher in patients aged >70 y (1.62, C.I. 1.0-2.61; p <0.05), and when indication for anticoagulant treatment was peripheral/cerebral arterial disease (1.84, C.I. 1.01-3.36; p <0.05). The frequency of thrombotic events was 17.5% when international normalised ratio (INR) levels were <1.5, decreasing to 2.3% for INRs within the 2-2.99 category (relative risk of INRs <2.0 vs. >2 = 1.88, C.1.1.16-3.07; p <0.05).The recorded rate of thrombotic events was lower than that reported in the few available studies. A greater risk should be expected during the first 90 days of treatment, when anticoagulation levels are <2.0 INR, in patients > 70 years and in those with cerebrovascular/peripheral arterial disease.
Activated protein C (APC) is a potent physiologic anticoagulant with profibrinolytic properties, and has been shown to prevent thrombosis in different experimental models. We investigated the effect of human APC on thrombin-induced thromboembolism in mice, a model of acute intravascular fibrin deposition leading to death within minutes. APC given intravenously (i.v.) as a bolus 2 min before thrombin challenge (1,250 U/kg) reduced mortality in a dose-dependent manner despite the lack of thrombin inhibitor activity. Significant inhibition of thrombin-induced death was observed at the dose of 0.05 mg/kg, and maximal protection was obtained with 2 mg/kg (> 85% reduction in mortality rate). Histology of lung tissue revealed that APC treatment (2 mg/kg) reduced significantly vascular occlusion rate (from 89.2 to 46.6%, P < 0.01). The protective effect of APC was due to the inhibition of endogenous thrombin formation as indicated by the fact that (a) the injection of human thrombin caused a marked decrease in the coagulation factors of the intrinsic and common pathways (but not of Factor VII), suggesting the activation of blood clotting via the contact system; (b) APC pretreatment reduced markedly prothrombin consumption; (c) the lethal effect of thrombin was almost abolished when the animals were made deficient in vitamin K-dependent factors by warfarin treatment, and could be restored only by doubling the dose of thrombin, indicating that the generation of endogenous thrombin contributes significantly to death; and (d) APC failed to protect warfarin-treated animals, in which mortality is entirely due to injected thrombin, even after protein S supplementation. Other results suggest that APC protects from thrombin-induced thromboembolism by rendering the formed fibrin more susceptible to plasmin degradation rather than by reducing fibrin formation: in thrombin-treated mice, fibrinogen consumption was not inhibited by APC; and inhibition of endogenous fibrinolysis by epsilon-aminocaproic or tranexamic acid resulted in a significant reduction of the protective effect of APC. Since APC did not enhance plasma fibrinolytic activity, as assessed by the measurement of plasminogen activator (PA) or PA inhibitor (PAI) activities, PAI-1 antigen, or 125I-fibrin degrading activity, we speculate that the inhibition of additional (endogenous) thrombin formation by APC interrupts thrombin-dependent mechanisms that make fibrin clots more resistant to lysis, so that the intravascular deposited fibrin can be removed more rapidly by the endogenous fibrinolytic system.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.