Introduction Cough intensity is an important determinant of cough severity. We set out to investigate and compare the physiological characteristics and intensity of voluntary (VC), induced (IC) and spontaneous cough (SC) in subjects with chronic cough. Methods 28 subjects with chronic cough (17 female, mean age 57 years) underwent measurement of oesophageal pressure (Poes), gastric pressure (Pga), normalised peak cough flow rate (PCFR) and peak abdominal electromyographic activity (EMG) were measured during (1) maximum VC (MVC), (2) capsaicin IC (2 doses: C 5 and supra-C 5 ; 1 st effort in a bout) and (3) SC (mean of 1 st efforts of all bouts), in a subset of patients (n=9). Cough efforts were categorised as bouts or single events and as true cough or expiratory reflex (ER: absence of preparatory inspiration). Results MVC by definition was always a single effort and all efforts were true coughs; no subject initiated an ER during MVC manoeuvres. The majority of efforts in IC (C 5) and SC occurred within coughing bouts. ERs were the most frequent type of efforts in both IC and SC, 61-67% of all efforts, but accounted for only one third of the initial efforts of bouts in both IC and SC; true cough was the most frequent 1 st effort (Table 1). Cough intensity was greatest in MVC for all measures. Poes, Pga and EMGabd were similar for IC and SC, and were approximately 60-70% of MVC intensity. PCFR:PEFRp however, was significantly higher in SC compared to IC. The analysis was similar for supra-C 5 stimulus with capsaicin. When restricted to the subgroup that underwent studies of all cough models (VC, IC and SC), the analysis was also similar. Conclusions This is the first study of the physiology of cough in patients with chronic cough and spontaneous cough. MVC produces the most intense cough. The type of cough effort in IC and SC is similar but there were important differences in cough intensity (flow). The reason for this and its implications for the induced cough model are unclear and warrant further investigation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.