The aim of this study was to estimate the incidence of COVID-19 disease in the French national population of dialysis patients, their course of illness and to identify the risk factors associated with mortality. Our study included all patients on dialysis recorded in the French REIN Registry in April 2020. Clinical characteristics at last follow-up and the evolution of COVID-19 illness severity over time were recorded for diagnosed cases (either suspicious clinical symptoms, characteristic signs on the chest scan or a positive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction) for SARS-CoV-2. A total of 1,621 infected patients were reported on the REIN registry from March 16th, 2020 to May 4th, 2020. Of these, 344 died. The prevalence of COVID-19 patients varied from less than 1% to 10% between regions. The probability of being a case was higher in males, patients with diabetes, those in need of assistance for transfer or treated at a self-care unit. Dialysis at home was associated with a lower probability of being infected as was being a smoker, a former smoker, having an active malignancy, or peripheral vascular disease. Mortality in diagnosed cases (21%) was associated with the same causes as in the general population. Higher age, hypoalbuminemia and the presence of an ischemic heart disease were statistically independently associated with a higher risk of death. Being treated at a selfcare unit was associated with a lower risk. Thus, our study showed a relatively low frequency of COVID-19 among dialysis patients contrary to what might have been assumed.

1. Increased aortic stiffness predisposes to myocardial ischaemia by increasing the systolic tension-time index and by decreasing aortic pressure throughout diastole. The tonometric subendocardial viability ratio (SEVR) is a non-invasive estimate of myocardial perfusion relative to cardiac workload. The hypothesis that SEVR is impaired in elderly hypertensives with high aortic pulse pressure (PP) was tested in the present study. 2. The SEVR was calculated by radial applanation tonometry in 203 subjects. In addition, diastolic time (DT), systolic time (ST) and mean diastolic and systolic aortic pressures (Pd and Ps, respectively) were calculated. First, 60 subjects matched for age and gender were analysed (20 controls, 20 hypertensives with pulse pressure (PP) < or = 60 mmHg, 20 hypertensives with PP > 60 mmHg; mean (+/-SD) age 64 +/- 9 years; 24 women, 36 men). The remaining 143 subjects, aged 53 +/- 10 years, were analysed subsequently. 3. The SEVR was similar in the three elderly groups (1.39 +/- 0.34, 1.39 +/- 0.28 and 1.35 +/- 0.25, in controls and hypertensive patients with PP < or = 60 and > 60 mmHg, respectively). The SEVR was positively related to DT/ST (r(2) = 0.89) and to DT (r(2) = 0.73) and was negatively related to heart rate (r(2) = 0.56; P < 0.001 each). However, SEVR was not related to ST, PP, mean Pd or mean Ps. At a given DT/ST, SEVR tended to be lower in hypertensives with PP > 60 mmHg than in hypertensives with normal PP. The positive linear relationship between SEVR and DT/ST was confirmed in the remaining 143 subjects (r(2) = 0.90), with no influence of aortic pressure. 4. The tonometric SEVR was not impaired in elderly hypertensive patients with increased aortic stiffness. In resting elderly and middle-aged individuals, the tonometric SEVR was mainly related to DT/ST ratio, not to aortic pressure.

1. The myocardial perfusion relative to left ventricular (LV) workload may be estimated by the subendocardial viability index (SVI). The SVI is a pressure-time integral ratio: the numerator is the area between aortic and LV pressures during diastolic time (DT) and the denominator is the area under the LV pressure curve during systolic time (ST). New non-invasive tonometric devices allow estimation of SVI but neglect LV end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) in the calculation. The aim of the present study was to determine the haemodynamic correlates of SVI and to test the effects of neglecting LVEDP on SVI estimation. 2. High-fidelity pressures were recorded at rest at the aortic root and LV level in 38 subjects (33 men/five women; mean (+/-SD) age 47 +/- 14 years; nine controls and 29 patients with various cardiac diseases). The SVI (1.16 +/- 0.28) was positively correlated with the DT/ST ratio (1.71 +/- 0.35; r(2) = 0.81) and was negatively correlated with LVEDP (15 +/- 7 mmHg; multiple r(2) = 0.94). The SVI was not related to aortic pressure (mean, pulse, mean systolic, mean diastolic). In 17 patients with LVEDP > 14 mmHg, the SVI calculated assuming zero LVEDP was 33 +/- 15% higher (range 16-70%) than the actual SVI. 3. The DT/ST ratio was the main determinant of the myocardial perfusion relative to cardiac workload and accounted for 81% of SVI variability, whereas aortic pressure did not contribute. Although LVEDP accounted for only 13% of SVI variability, it should be taken into account in the non-invasive calculation of SVI in patients with known or suspected increases in LV filling pressure.

No abstract