No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Crohn's disease is a chronic inflammation that may involve the entire gastrointestinal tract, from the mouth to the anus. The most widely accepted etiologic theory involves an immunologic aberration leading to local tissue destruction. Cell-mediated immunity with increased tumor necrosis factor (TNF) production may play a role in mucosal damage. Oral and laryngeal involvement are rare manifestations of Crohn's disease that are usually treated successfully by steroids. We here report a rare case of extra-intestinal Crohn's disease resistant to steroid therapy, which was successfully treated with infliximab, a chimeric antibody directed against TNF-alpha that is the only registered agent for the treatment of Crohn's disease. The relative safety, efficacy, and efficiency of infliximab make it an alternative treatment of which otolaryngologists should be aware.

Background Instead of choosing one endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) needle over the other, some advocate the use of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and fine-needle biopsy (FNB) consecutively. We explored the yield of combined use of 20 G FNB and 25 G FNA needles in patients with a suspicious solid gastrointestinal lesion. Methods Patients from the ASPRO study who were sampled with both needles during the same procedure were included. The incremental yield of dual sampling compared with the yield of single needle use on the diagnostic accuracy for malignancy was assessed for both dual sampling approaches – FNA followed by FNB, and vice versa. Results 73 patients were included. There were 39 (53 %) pancreatic lesions, 18 (25 %) submucosal masses, and 16 (22 %) lymph nodes. FNA was used first in 24 patients (33 %) and FNB was used first in 49 (67 %). Generally, FNB was performed after FNA to collect tissue for ancillary testing (75 %), whereas FNA was used after FNB to allow for on-site pathological assessment (76 %). Diagnostic accuracy for malignancy of single needle use increased from 78 % to 92 % with dual sampling (P = 0.002). FNA followed by FNB improved the diagnostic accuracy for malignancy (P = 0.03), whereas FNB followed by FNA did not (P = 0.13). Conclusion Dual sampling only improved diagnostic accuracy when 25 G FNA was followed by 20 G FNB and not vice versa. As the diagnostic benefit of the 20 G FNB over the 25 G FNA needle has recently been proven, sampling with the FNB needle seems a logical first choice.