BackgroundIn patients who undergo low anterior rectal resection, the fashioning of a covering stoma (CS) is still controversial. In fact, a covering stoma (ileostomy or colostomy) is worsened by major complications related to the procedure, longer recovery time, necessity of a re-intervention under general anesthesia for stoma closure and poorer quality of life. The advantage of Ghost Ileostomy (GI) is that an ileostomy can be performed only when there is clinical evidence of anastomotic leakage, without performing further interventions with related complications when anastomotic leak is absent and therefore the procedure is not necessary. Moreover, in case of anastomotic dehiscence and necessity of delayed stoma opening, mortality and morbidity in patients with GI are comparable with the ones that occur in patients which had a classic covering stoma. On the other hand, is simple to think about the possible economic saving: avoiding an admission for performing the closure of the ileostomy, with all the costs connected (OR, hospitalization, post-operative period, treatment of possible complications) represents a huge saving for the hospital management and also raise the quality of life of the patients.MethodsIn this study we prospectively analyzed 20 patients who underwent anterior extra-peritoneal rectum resection for rectal carcinoma with TME and fashioning of GI realized with or without abdominal parietal split.ResultsIn the group of patients that received a GI without split laparotomy mortality was absent and in one case an anastomotic leak occurred. In the group of patients in which GI with split laparotomy was fashioned, one death occurred and there were one case of infection and one respiratory complication. Clinical follow-up was 12 months.ConclusionsThe use of different techniques for fashioning a GI do not present significant differences when they are performed by expert surgeons, but further evidence is needed with more randomized trials, in order to have more data supporting the clinical observation.

No abstract

AbstractBackground: Diverticular disease of the colon is common in the Western world. With the first episode of diverticulitis, most patients will benefit from medical therapy, but in 10% to 20% of cases some complications will develop, such as intra-abdominal abscesses, obstructions, fistulas. In these conditions it is important to define the most appropriate surgical approach. Discussion: The management of diverticular disease has been successful owing to the advances in diagnostic methods, intensive care and surgical experience, but there is debate about the best treatment for some conditions. Fistulas complicating diverticulitis are the result of a localized perforation into adjacent viscera. In particular, the connection between the colon and the urinary tract is a serious anatomical abnormality that must be urgently corrected before a serious urinary infection results. Indications, timing and surgical procedures are determined by the severity of the disease and the patient’s general condition. Summary: Diverticular disease can lead to many complications. One of the most difficult to correct is an internal fistula, such as a colo-vesical fistula. The correct approach in cases where the disorder is clinically suspected has always been controversial, and the guidelines for sigmoid diverticulitis have not established the most appropriate method for diagnosis and treatment. At present, the surgical strategy for these cases requires interruption of the fistula and resection to remove the inflamed colonic segment, with or without primary anastomosis, focusing attention on the construction of the anastomosis to well vascularized and anatomically healthy tissues. It is clear, therefore, that establishing guidelines is difficult, because many pathological situations may be related to diverticulitis, and so, as our experience shows, the surgical approach has to be tailored to the patient’s general and local condition.

No abstract

No abstract