Two surfaces are "sticky" if breaking their mutual contact requires a finite tensile force. At low fractal dimensions D, there is consensus stickiness does not depend on the upper truncation frequency of roughness spectrum (or "magnification"). As debate is still open for the case at high D, we exploit BAM theory of Ciavarella and Persson-Tosatti theory, to derive criteria for all fractal dimensions. For high D, we show that stickiness is more influenced by short wavelength roughness with respect to the low D case. BAM converges at high magnifications to a simple criterion which depends only on D, in agreement with theories that includes Lennard-Jones traction-gap law, while Persson-Tosatti disagrees because of its simplifying approximations.

In the present short note, we generalize simple approximate Johnson-Jaffar-Barber solutions for the indentation by a rigid punch of a thin elastic layer on a rigid foundation to the case of adhesion. This could be an interesting geometry for an adhesive system, a limit case of the more general class of layered systems, or FGMs (Functionally Graded Materials). We show that ultrastrong adhesion (up to theoretical strength) can be reached both in line contact or in axisymmetric contact for thin layers (typically of nanoscale size), which suggests a new possible strategy for "optimal adhesion". In particular, in line contact adhesion enhancement occurs as an increase of the actual pull-off force, while in axisymmetric case the latter is apparently very close to the classical JKR case. However, it appears in closer examination that also for axisymmetric case, the enhancement occurs by reducing the size of contact needed to sustain the pull-off force. These effects are further enhanced by Poisson's ratio effects in the case of nearly incompressible layer.

In a recent very interesting and illuminating proposal, Yao et al. (2014) have discussed the use of the strain energy release rate (SERR) as a parameter to characterize fatigue delamination growth in composite materials. They consider fatigue delamination data strongly affected by R-curve behaviour due to fibres bridging and argue that a better approach is to correlate the crack advance with the total work per cycle measured in the testing machine. This seems to work better than estimating the compliance as a linear fit of experimental curves from Modified Compliance Calibration ASTM standards equations for the SERR in the classical Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics framework. We show however that if we assume indeed linear behaviour (i.e. LEFM), the approach they introduce is perfectly equivalent to the SERR one, i.e. Paris type of laws. As well known form Barenblatt and Botvina, fatigue crack growth is a weak form of scaling, and it gives Paris classical dependence only when the crack is much longer than any other characteristic sizes. Paris' law is not a fundamental law of physics, is not an energy balance equation like Griffith, and strong size effects due to cohesive zones have been found already in concrete by Bazant. The proposal is very simple, and interesting as it would seem to suggest that a proper scaling with a cohesive model at crack tip could be predicted, although this doesn't seem to have been attempted in the Literature. The main drawback of the present proposal is that it is not predictive, but purely observational, as it requires the actual measurement of work input during the fatigue process.

No abstract