The amount of RR variability and its slower fluctuations largely depend on physical activity, regardless of its regular or irregular occurrence. Attempts to predict cardiovascular prognosis on the basis of RR fluctuations should therefore take account of the confounding effect of physical activity since healthier subjects would probably be more active.

The relative role of parasympathetic, sympathetic, and ventilatory influences in the genesis of blood pressure and R-R interval variability is controversial. In 13 freely behaving WKY rats instrumented with venous and arterial catheters and chest electrodes, mean arterial pressure (MAP, mmHg), R-R interval (ms), and respiratory fluctuations were monitored for 90 min in the control condition and after intravenous atropine (0.75 mg/kg) and/or propranolol (1 mg/kg). Spectral power (pw) in the 0.25- to 0.75-Hz (midfrequency, MF) and the 0.75- to 3.0-Hz (high-frequency, HF, respiratory-synchronous) bands was computed in sequences of 400 heartbeats by use of a combined autoregressive analysis. Atropine reduced but did not abolish HF R-R interval pw (from 1.73 +/- 0.50 to 0.39 +/- 0.27 ms2, P < 0.01) and halved HF MAP pw (from 0.41 +/- 0.30 to 0.21 +/- 0.12 mmHg2, P < 0.05), whereas propranolol did not affect HF pw of the R-R interval or MAP. Propranolol also failed to significantly modify MF R-R interval pw (from 0.48 +/- 0.44 to 0.40 +/- 0.34 ms2, P = NS) or MF MAP pw (from 0.54 +/- 0.39 to 0.42 +/- 0.20 mmHg2, P = NS), whereas atropine virtually abolished MF R-R interval pw (from 0.48 +/- 0.44 to 0.01 +/- 0.01 ms2, P < 0.01) and also significantly reduced MF MAP pw (from 0.54 +/- 0.39 to 0.33 +/- 0.24 mmHg2, P < 0.01). The effects of combined blockade were similar to those of atropine alone.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)