No abstract

13The identification of fungal species and determination of their significance in the clinical laboratory are complex practices that help establish or exclude a fungal cause of disease. In the past, the clinical mycologist utilized a limited array of phenotypic measurements for categorizing isolates to the species level. This scenario is shifting in favor of molecular identification strategies largely due to a combination of several factors: (i) the changing landscape of epidemiology of medically important fungi, in which novel organisms never before implicated in human infection are being reported from clinical samples (10, 41); (ii) reports of species-specific differences in antifungal susceptibilities of these newly recognized fungi (4, 10, 41); (iii) numerous studies demonstrating that morphology alone may not be a sufficiently objective method for species determination (7,8,10,23,41); and (iv) a growing scarcity of bench scientists and microbiologists trained in traditional mycology. With the increasing incidence of fungal infections and reports of invasive fungal infections in nontraditional populations, such as patients with critical illnesses, the onus is on the clinical microbiologist/mycologist to return a timely and accurate identification. Molecular methods are rapid with a turnaround time of about 24 h from the time of DNA extraction, yield results that are objective with data portable between labs, and could be more economical in the long run.Few topics are more controversial or evoke such a passionate response as the term "species" to a mycologist. Molecular studies have demonstrated that a strategy where multiple genes (or portions thereof) are sequenced and the resultant data are analyzed by phylogenetic methods is a robust strategy for fungal species recognition. This concept, known as phylogenetic species recognition (PSR) (40), has been used successfully to define species in the genera Fusarium and Aspergillus (8,23,29,31,32). The advent of PSR has greatly clarified the taxonomy of these genera and as such is a powerful tool for fungal species delimitation. However, this methodology is expensive and requires phylogenetic expertise, which may be limiting factors in clinical microbiology laboratories. In reality, once a species has been delimited by PSR using several robust loci, sequence diversity within the species is known, and on the basis of this knowledge, comparative sequence analyses from a single locus can be used for rapid species identification. "Cutoff scores," which are dependent on genetic diversity within and between sibling species, can then be provided.Thus, it is important to clarify that our intent in this editorial is to address the practice of species "identification" as applied to a clinical setting and not species "classification" necessary for taxonomic categorization. Although the two terms can be overlapping, the purpose of an "identification" method in a clinical microbiology laboratory is the ability to provide a specific name or epithet to an organism rapidly and wi...

A population-based survey was conducted to investigate the epidemiology of and antifungal resistance in Spanish clinical strains of filamentous fungi isolated from deep tissue samples, blood cultures, and respiratory samples. The study was conducted in two different periods (October 2010 and May 2011) to analyze seasonal variations. A total of 325 strains were isolated in 29 different hospitals. The average prevalence was 0.0016/1,000 inhabitants. Strains were identified by sequencing of DNA targets and susceptibility testing by the European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing reference procedure. The most frequently isolated genus was Aspergillus, accounting for 86.3% of the isolates, followed by Scedosporium at 4.7%; the order Mucorales at 2.5%; Penicillium at 2.2%, and Fusarium at 1.2%. The most frequent species was Aspergillus fumigatus (48.5%), followed by A. flavus (8.4%), A. terreus (8.1%), A. tubingensis (6.8%), and A. niger (6.5%). Cryptic/sibling Aspergillus species accounted for 12% of the cases. Resistance to amphotericin B was found in 10.8% of the isolates tested, while extended-spectrum triazole resistance ranged from 10 to 12.7%, depending on the azole tested. Antifungal resistance was more common among emerging species such as those of Scedosporium and Mucorales and also among cryptic species of Aspergillus, with 40% of these isolates showing resistance to all of the antifungal compounds tested. Cryptic Aspergillus species seem to be underestimated, and their correct classification could be clinically relevant. The performance of antifungal susceptibility testing of the strains implicated in deep infections and multicentric studies is recommended to evaluate the incidence of these cryptic species in other geographic areas.

No abstract

This guideline is the second in the line of three for fungal diseases by ESCMID and other societies. The guideline tried to follow the AGREE criteria for the development of clinical guidelines. This guideline serves as a European and potentially world-wide recommendation for the diagnosis and management of rare and emerging fungi. They include mucormycosis, hyalohyphomycosis (Fusarium, Paecilomyces, Scedosporium, etc.), phaeohyphomycosis (Alternaria, Bipolaris, Cladosporium, Rhinocladiella, etc.), and emerging yeasts (Saccharomyces, Trichosporon, Rhodotorula, etc.).