In this comparable group of patients, cyanoacrylate glue injection was more cost effective than TIPS in the management of acute gastric variceal bleeding. A prospective, randomized trial would be required to confirm our analysis.
IntroductionCholestasis related pruritus, secondary to intrahepatic and/or extrahepatic biliary obstruction is a common manifestation in chronic liver disease. Pruritus is difficult to treat, and results are often suboptimal. A stepwise medical approach is usually employed, followed by a trial molecular adsorbents recirculation system in medication resistant cases. Pruritus resulting in reduced quality of life is a variant syndrome eligible for liver transplantation in the setting of preserved synthetic function.AimThis case series describes the use of long-term (LT) nasobiliary drainage (NBD) in three patients with intractable pruritus. This case series tests the hypothesis that LT-NBD could be successfully used to alleviate cholestasis related pruritus, and prevent or delay the need for liver transplantation.MethodLT-NBD was carried out in three female patients (mean age 43 years) with intractable pruritus secondary to primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) (n=2), and benign recurrent intrahepatic cholestasis (n=1). NBD was carried out through the endoscopic placement of a 6 French Cook Medical nasobiliary catheter into the common bile duct.ResultsSymptomatic relief of pruritus was described by all three cases within 24 h of NBD placement. LT-NBD was stopped in the patient with benign recurrent intrahepatic cholestasis after 8 weeks due to complete resolution of pruritus. In one patient with PBC, LT-NBD was undertaken over 12 months, with complete resolution of pruritus. In the second patient with PBC, LT-NBD was carried out over 14 months, with complete resolution of pruritus.DiscussionThis case series supports the efficacy of LT-NBD in the treatment of intractable pruritus. We propose that NBD offers an accessible modality for the treatment of intractable pruritus in liver disease, potentially avoiding the need for liver transplantation.
1. Fasting levels of plasma cysteine, plasma sulphate and the plasma cysteine/sulphate ratio were measured in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis and compared with those in patients with other liver disease, general intensive therapy unit patients and healthy subjects. 2. Plasma cysteine was significantly elevated in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (median 0.364 nmol/mg of protein, P < 0.0001) and patients with other liver disease (median 0.445 nmol/mg of protein, P < 0.0001), compared with healthy control subjects (median 0.125 nmol/mg of protein) and increased progressively with the severity of liver disease. Plasma cysteine was also elevated in intensive therapy unit patients (median 1.564 nmol/mg of protein) compared with healthy control subjects (P < 0.0001) and patients with other liver disease (P < 0.0001). 3. Plasma sulphate was reduced significantly only in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (median 0.822 nmol/mg of protein) compared with healthy control subjects (median 1.37 nmol/mg of protein, P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in plasma sulphate between disease groups. 4. The plasma cysteine/sulphate ratio was significantly elevated in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (median 0.448, P < 0.0001) and patients with other liver diseases (median 0.394, P < 0.0001) compared with healthy control subjects (median 0.095). The ratio was also elevated in intensive therapy unit patients (median 1.650, P < 0.0001) compared with healthy control subjects and liver disease groups (P < 0.0001). 5. In conclusion, cysteine rises in primary biliary cirrhosis and other forms of liver disease. This effect is not specific to liver disease, since cysteine is elevated in an heterogeneous group receiving intense care.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.