Objective: Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs), key transcriptional regulators of lipid and energy metabolism in cardiomyocytes, have recently been proposed to modulate cardiovascular pathophysiological responses in experimental models. However, there is little information about the functional activity of PPARs in human heart failure. Aims: To investigate PPAR-a and -g expression and activity, and the association with ET-1 production and fibrosis, in cardiac biopsies from patients with end-stage heart failure due to ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) in comparison and from non-failing donor hearts. All samples were obtained during cardiac transplantation. Methods and results: Morphological analysis (by Masson trichrome and image analysis) did not detect fibrosis in the left atrium from nonfailing donors (NFLA) or from ICM patients (FLA). However, left ventricles from failing hearts (FLV) contained a greater number of fibrotic areas (NFLA: 3.21 T1.15, FLA: 1.63 T 0.83, FLV: 14.5 T 3.45%; n = 9, P < 0.05). By RT-PCR, preproET-1 expression was similar in the nonfailing and failing atrium but was significantly higher in the ventricles from failing hearts (NFLA: 1.00 T 0.06, FLA: 1.08 T 0.11, FLV: 1.74 T 0.19; n = 9, P < 0.05). PPAR-a and PPAP-g mRNA (by RT-PCR) and protein (by Western blot) levels were higher in the ventricles from failing hearts compared with the atrium from failing and non-failing hearts. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays showed that PPAR-a and PPAP-g were not activated in the ventricles (NFLA: 1.00 T 0.11, FLA: 1.89 T 0.24, FLV: 0.95 T 0.07; n = 9, P < 0.05). Conclusions: These data suggest that PPAR-a and PPAP-g are selectively activated in the atria from ICM patients and might be functionally important in the maintenance of atrial morphology.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.