We report the use of the uncemented Kotz modular femur and tibia reconstruction system after 95 distal femoral resections performed from 1983 to 1989. The average follow-up was 51 months; 62 patients had at least 36 months' follow-up and 36 at least 60 months. Complications required reoperation in 55 % . The postoperative infection rate was 5 % for primary cases, 6% for revision cases, and 43 % for revision of previously infected cases. The polyethylene bushes failed in 42 % of cases at an average of 64 months postoperatively. Stem breakage occurred in 6% and was associated with the use of narrow stems and extensive quadriceps excision. The radiological results were excellent or good in most cases and were related to the initial screw fixation, but not to age, chemotherapy, length of resection or size of stem. The clinical results were excellent or good in 75 %, failure usually being associated with a complication, especially infection.
Seven patients underwent total resection of the femur with replacement by the Kotz modular femur and tibia reconstruction system (KMFTR); three of these operations were for primary malignant tumours and four were salvage procedures after failed limb-sparing surgery. Clinical and radiological results were excellent or good at final follow up at an average of 23 months. A new method of radiological assessment has been used for the acetabular component of bipolar hip endoprosthesis. The polyethylene bush of the hinged knee component may wear. Reattachment of the abductors to the endoprostheses often fails and we now suture the abductors to the fascia lata. The rectus femoris muscle should be saved, if possible, after resection. When total excision of the quadriceps is indicated, the knee should be arthrodesed. The KMFTR is easy to use and has provided good medium to long term results in our cases.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.