Quantitative data on carbon stock (C stock) in and beyond the topsoil (0–30 cm) under natural terrestrial ecosystems in West African savanna could provide information about their relative potential, and management options, for C sequestration, but these data are still scanty in the region. In selected locations (Nsukka, Obimo, and Ibagwa-aka) in the derived savanna zone of south-eastern Nigeria, secondary forest (SFT), grassland fallow (GLF), and bare footpath (BFP) were sampled from the topsoils (0–30 cm) and subsoils (30–60 cm) in triplicate. The soils are generally sandy, with low (1.4–13.8%) mean silt content. Mean bulk density ranged from 1.30 to 1.83 Mg/m3. The soils were acidic (pHwater 4.0–4.8) and low in organic C (0.10–1.14%). There was a consistent trend in C stock (SFT > GLF > BFP) in the topsoil, whereas only higher values in SFT than BFP were consistent in the subsoil. In both soil layers, the scale of the differences among the land-cover types was location-specific. Values of C stock were higher in the topsoil than subsoil, except for GLF and BFP at Obimo due to recent bush burning. Irrespective of location, the mean topsoil–subsoil values under SFT, GLF, and BFP were 45.7–30.6, 27.7–25.8, and 19.0–18.8 Mg/ha, respectively. Soil structural stability, indexed as the ratio of organic matter to silt + clay, explained roughly 61 and 89% of the variability in C stock of topsoils and subsoils, respectively. These results should benefit the planning of C sequestration projects in savanna agroecosystems of West Africa.
SUMMARYOver a decade after the forest-savanna transition zone of Nigeria was deemed suitable for production of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor), no research has been undertaken on the crop's tillage requirements in the southeastern part of the zone. This study evaluated the effects of tillage-mulch practices on soil moisture, water use (WU), grain yield and water use efficiency (WUE) of the crop in a Typic Paleustult (sandy loam) at Nsukka during 2006 and 2007 growing seasons. In a split-plot design, no-till (NT) and conventional tillage (CT) treatments were left bare (B) or covered with mulch (M) at 5 Mg ha−1. The ensuing treatments (NTB, NTM, CTB, and CTM) represented four tillage methods, which were replicated four times in a randomized complete block. In the monitored root zone, NTB and CTM significantly (p ≤ 0.05) enhanced the soil moisture status over NTM and CTB, but the main effects of the tillage and the mulch factors were not significant. The crop WU was uninfluenced by the treatments throughout the study. Although the grain yield showed higher values with NT than with CT, the differences were significant (p ≤ 0.05) only in 2007 that was marked with erratic rainfall and relatively low mean yield. Mulch significantly (p ≤ 0.05) enhanced the grain yield in 2006, with greater effect in CT than NT. On average, the mulch plots out-yielded their bare counterparts by about 26%. The tillage × mulch interaction was significant (p ≤ 0.01), and showed higher grain yields in NTB, NTM and CTM than in CTB. In the year-weighted average, yield increments in NTB, NTM and CTM over CTB were 53, 53 and 67% respectively, a pointer to the relevance of mulch with the CT but not the NT. Relative WU showed that the crop's water demand was met under all treatments. Hence, the yield reduction in the CTB was not due to water shortage. The WUE varied among the treatments in the same pattern as grain yield. In summary, NTB and CTM proved superior to NTM only in soil moisture status but to CTB in all measured parameters. From a socio-economic viewpoint, however, NTB would be preferable to CTM for growing sorghum in this area.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.