Fetal macrosomia (birth weight >/=4,500 g) is known to increase a number of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. Although there is a clear association between maternal diabetes mellitus and fetal macrosomia, the majority of macrosomic infants are born to non-diabetic mothers. We wished to determine the recurrence rate of macrosomia in non-diabetic pregnancy and to see if a history of multiple prior macrosomic infants confers additional risk. A retrospective analysis of 14,461 term, singleton, infants born to non-diabetic mothers in 1997 and 1998 was performed, using a computerised hospital database. Among 14,461 term pregnancies, 529 infants (3.7%) were macrosomic, and the incidence was significantly higher in parous women (4.6%) compared with nulliparas (2.4%, p < 0.0001). Over the next 5 years, 164 of these women returned for another delivery. Women with a history of one macrosomic infant are at significantly increased risk of another macrosomic infant in a subsequent pregnancy (OR 15.8, 95% CI 11.45 - 21.91, p < 0.0001). For women with two or more macrosomic infants, the risk is even greater (OR 47.4, 95% CI 19.9 - 112.89, p < 0.0001). Macrosomia was associated with increased rates of instrumental delivery and anal sphincter injury regardless of parity, and additionally with increased rates of caesarean delivery and shoulder dystocia among nulliparas. Overall, 88% of women who laboured with a macrosomic infant achieved vaginal delivery.

No abstract

No abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the factors which may influence rapid labour in nulliparae. This is a cohort study of 991 consecutive nulliparae who were admitted in spontaneous labour with a singleton pregnancy and cephalic presentation. The setting was the National Maternity Hospital, Dublin where active management of labour is applied to all nulliparae fitting the above criteria. Rapid labour of 2 hours or less occurred in 82 patients (8.3%). Dilatation of 2 cm of the cervix on admission in labour, gestation of less than 37 weeks, and diminishing birthweight, were more common in rapid labours compared with other labours. Women in rapid labour were not surprisingly less likely to require oxytocin augmentation, or to need operative vaginal delivery or Caesarean section, receive epidural anaesthesia, or attend antenatal classes, compared with other women in labour. Rapid labour was not influenced by the finding that the membranes were already ruptured before admission, the time spent at home with contractions, or social background. Women with rapid labour were more likely to arrive in hospital within 4 hours compared with other women in labour. Rapid labour depends on the efficiency of uterine action which is reflected by the dilatation of the cervix on admission.

(Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;220(5):465–468) As the maternal mortality rate in the United States has risen over the past 30 years, efforts to improve maternal and fetal outcomes have produced protocols and checklists for use in various obstetric settings. With these changes comes a need for reevaluation of the approach to trauma in pregnancy, focusing on standardization. Advanced Trauma Life Support, overseen by the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma, is widely recognized as the standard for the initial evaluation and treatment of trauma patients. This report described a fetal trauma survey designed to integrate with Advanced Trauma Life Support.