Objective: To evaluate changes in quality of in‐hospital care of patients with either acute coronary syndromes (ACS) or congestive heart failure (CHF) admitted to hospitals participating in a multisite quality improvement collaboration.
Design: Before‐and‐after study of changes in quality indicators measured on representative patient samples between June 2001 and January 2003.
Setting: Nine public hospitals in Queensland.
Study populations: Consecutive or randomly selected patients admitted to study hospitals during the baseline period (June 2001 to January 2002; n = 807 for ACS, n = 357 for CHF) and post‐intervention period (July 2002 to January 2003; n = 717 for ACS, n = 220 for CHF).
Intervention: Provision of comparative baseline feedback at a facilitative workshop combined with hospital‐specific quality‐improvement interventions supported by on‐site quality officers and a central program management group.
Main outcome measure: Changes in process‐of‐care indicators between baseline and post‐intervention periods.
Results: Compared with baseline, more patients with ACS in the post‐intervention period received therapeutic heparin regimens (84% v 72%; P < 0.001), angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors (64% v 56%; P = 0.02), lipid‐lowering agents (72% v 62%; P < 0.001), early use of coronary angiography (52% v 39%; P < 0.001), in‐hospital cardiac counselling (65% v 43%; P < 0.001), and referral to cardiac rehabilitation (15% v 5%; P < 0.001). The numbers of patients with CHF receiving β‐blockers also increased (52% v 34%; P < 0.001), with fewer patients receiving deleterious agents (13% v 23%; P = 0.04). Same‐cause 30‐day readmission rate decreased from 7.2% to 2.4% (P = 0.02) in patients with CHF.
Conclusion: Quality‐improvement interventions conducted as multisite collaborations may improve in‐hospital care of acute cardiac conditions within relatively short time frames.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.