Priapism is characterised by a persistent erection that cannot be relieved by sexual intercourse or masturbation. Although priapism subsides spontaneously in a few days, impotence frequently follows. Both vascular and neural mechanisms are implicated in the pathophysiology of priapism, but it is not clear which initiates the process. Idiopathic cases of priapism are the most frequent (near 50%); other medical conditions that can result in priapism are haematological diseases (mainly sickle cell anaemia and leukaemia), traumatism, and neoplastic processes. Drug-induced priapism comprises about 30% of cases. The drugs most frequently implicated are psychotropic drugs (phenothiazines and trazodone), antihypertensives (mainly prazosin) and heparin. Recently, the intracavernosal injection of vasoactive drugs (papaverine and phentolamine) has been described in patients treated for impotence. With the exception of heparin, an alpha-adrenergic blocking mechanism has been suggested in the priapism-inducing action of these drugs. A significant number of anecdotal case reports link priapism and drugs, and it is possible that certain cases of idiopathic priapism could be reclassified if accurate pharmacological anamnesis were to be performed. Priapism must be considered a urological emergency. Surgical procedures are the most preferred treatment for this condition but, in selected cases, drug treatment seems to be an alternative approach.

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in pediatrics (0-14 years) is especially important because the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of drugs and drug pharmacokinetic profiles can be different from that of the adult population. In this context, several parameters like half-life of drug elimination from the body (t(1/2)), peak plasma concentration (Cmax), area under the curve, clearance (CL), Tmax, and dose/concentration relationship in children may differ from adults. Hence, the knowledge of pharmacokinetic parameters and therapeutic and toxic ranges of drug concentrations may help the clinicians to optimize drug treatment regimens in the pediatric population. TDM of psychotropic drugs requires particular attention for the pharmacological and clinical consequences of nonadequate dose use, lack in the compliance, and overdoses with possible toxic effects. Psychoactive drugs such as benzodiazepines, antiepileptic drugs, tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, antipsychotic drugs, psychostimulants (attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder drugs), opioid analgesics, and antimigraine drugs are a heterogeneous group. These drugs are subject to interindividual variability, and therefore, the usefulness of TDM for these drugs has to be assessed individually. Because of the occurrence of comorbid pathologies, including psychiatric disorders, the use of combined pharmacotherapy is not uncommon. As a consequence, these patients may be at risk from a number of potential drug-drug interactions. The implementation of TDM in pediatric population is more difficult than in adults because some sampling procedures are invasive and cause discomfort in children, and additionally, they require the cooperation of the patient. Several examples will be provided where the use of alternative matrices, such as saliva, is proposed to minimize inconvenience and patient discomfort.

A total of 157 patients were treated with tobramycin or amikacin in a controlled prospective randomized trial. Dosages were adjusted to renal function according to a nomogram. Trough and peak aminoglycoside levels were available at the end of the trial. Of the above total, 113 recipients of nine or more doses of tobramycin or six or more doses of amikacin, without other apparent cause of renal failure, were evaluated for nephrotoxicity. Thirty-six patients were evaluated for auditory toxicity. The patients in groups evaluated for either nephrotoxicity or auditory toxicity were similar with respect to intensity and etiology of bacterial disease, concurrent exposure to other antimicrobial drugs, a,ge and sex distribution, initial serum creatinine level, and total dose and duration of antimicrobial therapy. Nephrotoxicity of similar severity developed in 4 of 59 (6.8%) recipients of tobramycin and in 7 of 54 (13.1%o) recipients of amikacin (P > 0.05). Mild auditory toxicity developed in 3 of 19 (15.7%) recipients of tobramycin and in 2 of 17 (11.7%) recipients of amikacin (P > 0.05). When patients with abnormally high mean trough or peak aminoglycoside levels were excluded from comparison, nephrotoxicity was 6.12 and 5.12% (P > 0.05) and auditory toxicity was 17.6 and 7.69%6 (P > 0.05) in the groups given tobramycin and amikacin, respectively, We conclude that the nephrotoxicity and auditory toxicity of amniacin and tobramycin are not significantly different and that such toxicities are indeed infrequent events when the dosages of these drugs are adjusted to hold blood levels within the safe boundaries suggested by the studies of others.

Monitoring plasma levels of antiepileptic drugs for the treatment and prophylaxis of epilepsy is one of the strategies enabling clinical results to improve by reducing adverse affects and increasing effectiveness. The objective of this article is to review the basic aspects in the monitoring of antiepileptic drugs using a consensus document prepared and endorsed by the pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics working group (PK.gen) of the Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria (Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacists).

No abstract