We present a retrospective study of immune tolerance treatment (ITT) carried out in 42 Spanish haemophiliac patients. Most of the patients were high responders (39/42), with a median maximum titre of 67 Bethesda units (BU) (range 6-2984). The median inhibitor titre at the start the ITT was 11 BU (range 1-256 BU) and the median age of the patients was 7 years (range 0-57). The mean factor dosage was 140 IU kg bodyweight(-1) day(-1) (range 25-500). In most of the ITTs, plasma-derived factor concentrate of intermediate and high purity was used. The inhibitor was eradicated in 26/38 (68%) of the patients who completed the treatment and two patients changed their status from high to low responders. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that three significant variables were associated with the highest probability of success: (i) the use of low factor doses for ITT (< or = 100 IU kg(-1) day(-1); P = 0.0106; 95% CI 0.000289-0.342); (ii) a titre of < 10 BU at start of ITT (P = 0.0286; 95% CI 0.00253-0.7189) and (iii) a lower maximum titre (P = 0.0214; 95% CI 0.98-0.9994).
Treatment adherence in adolescents with chronic diseases is around 50%, and failure is more common in preventive therapy. In haemophilia, contradictory results are reported by the published studies. The objective of this study was to evaluate adherence with factor VIII (FVIII) prophylaxis in Spanish patients with severe haemophilia A between age 6 and 20 years. Data were collected retrosp-ectively in the previous 2 years. The primary endpoint was the absolute adherence index (AAI), and the endpoints were related to clinical status, age, prophylaxis regimen, responsibility for factor administration and quality of life (QoL), assessed by the Haemo-QoL questionnaires. A total of 78 patients from 14 Spanish hospitals were recruited. Adherence ranged between -64.4 and 66.7 (mean -3.08). No differences were observed between children and adolescents (7.11 vs. 6.39; P = 0.809). A statistically significant association (P < 0.010) between infra adherent group and target joint was found, as was a statistically significant difference (P < 0.010) between the number of bleeding episodes experienced by the adherent group (mean 1.4) and by infra adherents (mean 4.5). There was no significant difference between AAI and prophylactic regimen (6.35 vs. 6.96, P = 0.848), neither between AAI and the person responsible for factor administration (5.57 vs. 8.79, P = 0.326). The Haemo-QoL scores (8-12 years) were related to adherence level (P < 0.05). Adherence was approximately ideal and patients perceived a high QoL. Because of the repercussions for compliance, it is essential to work during puberty on emotional and self-acceptance aspects of the disease, as well as coping, and the patient's family, school and health team relationships.
A haemophilia-specific health-related quality-of-life questionnaire (named 'Hemofilia-QoL') was developed to assess quality-of-life in adults with haemophilia, and was psychometrically tested. Seventy-three interviews with haemophilia patients and health care professionals were used to generate the items included in the questionnaire, and expert ratings on the items formulated were used to screen them for potential omission. This was followed by psychometric testing in a sample of 35 patients. Preliminary psychometric testing of the revised questionnaire version, which contains 10 domains (physical health, physical role, joint damage, pain, treatment satisfaction, emotional role, mental health, social support), showed acceptable reliability (alpha = 0.94 for the Hemofilia-QoL total score) and validity, and this will be examined in a subsequent study with a larger patient sample.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.