The Coulter LH 750 is a new haematology analyser with several new features: a count of nucleated red blood cells (NRBCs), automated WBC correction in presence of a flag indicating a cellular interference and a lower incidence of platelet or WBC interference flags when compared with the GEN.S, our current instrument. We had three main goals in our study: evaluating the LH 750 WBC counts when a GEN.S flag suggests a risk of WBC interference, ascertaining whether the platelet counts not flagged by the LH 750 were accurately assessed in samples flagged by the GEN.S and evaluating the NRBC assay provided by the LH 750. Flow cytometry, using CD45 and CD41, respectively for WBC and platelet labelling, was used as a reference method to assess the accuracy of the LH 750 counts. NRBC were identified by double labelling with propidium iodide (PI) and CD45, NRBCs being CD45-/PI+. A significant relationship was found between LH 750 and flow cytometric WBC counts, whether a WBC correction was made by the LH 750 (r = 0.9809, n = 54) or not (r = 0.9901, n = 23). A highly significant relationship was observed for platelets not only in the range from 0 to 450 x 10(9)/l (r = 0.981, n = 108) but also in cases of thrombocytopenia (range: 0-80 x 10(9)/l; r = 0.956, n = 51). In samples with NRBCs, the NRBC percentages given by the LH 750 and by flow cytometry were highly correlated (r = 0.977, n = 60) and WBC counts were accurate. In conclusion, the reduction in flagging by the LH 750, the accuracy of the results, and the availability of a NRBC count, constitute major advantages.

Chlamydia pneumoniae is a common respiratory tract pathogen. Serological methods currently used for the diagnosis of C. pneumoniae infection lack specificity, give ambiguous results from a single serum sample and often provide only a retrospective diagnosis. A prospective study was undertaken to assess whether PCR could be a useful addition to the serological techniques routinely practised for diagnosis. This study investigated 68 adult patients with a diagnosis of acute respiratory infection. Acute and convalescent serological determination of antibodies to C. pneumoniae were performed by means of an rELISA test and a micro-immunofluorescence (MIF) test. Nasopharyngeal aspirates or bronchoalveolar lavage specimens and bronchial aspirates obtained from the 68 patients were evaluated by PCR-enzyme immunoassay (PCR-EIA) for the presence of C. pneumoniae and by immunofluorescence assay and cell culture for virus identification. Mycoplasma pneumoniae serology was also performed. Eight patients (11.8%) were positive by either rELISA or PCR-EIA, or both, with an infection rate of 5 (18.5%) of 27 in patients with community-acquired pneumonia, 2 (9%) of 22 in asthmatic patients and 1 (5%) of 19 in patients with an exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Serological evidence of acute infection was found in four of these patients with the rELISA test and in three others with the MIF test. PCR-EIA detected C. pneumoniae DNA in four specimens, but there were concordant results with both rELISA and PCR-EIA in only one patient. A positive PCR-EIA was also obtained in a patient who did not show an antibody response in acute serum. The discrepancy between serological and PCR-EIA results reflects the difficulties in routine laboratory diagnosis of C. pneumoniae infection and the necessity for further studies with optimised techniques.