Imaging studies have shown that serum concentrations of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor citalopram correlate with serotonin transporter (5-HTT) occupancy in vivo. In patients with major depressive disorders treated with citalopram, 80% 5-HTT occupancy was considered to be necessary for maximal therapeutic effects, which requires citalopram serum concentrations of at least 50 ng/mL. The aim of this study was to compare treatment outcome in patients with citalopram serum concentrations greater than and less than 50 ng/mL after 7 days of treatment. This study included inpatients with acute major depressive disorder according to International Classification of Disease, 10th Revision who were treated with citalopram. In weekly intervals, the severity of depression was assessed with the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17), and serum concentrations of citalopram were measured from baseline until week 5. Fifty-five patients were eligible for this analysis. After 7 days of treatment, 19 patients showed citalopram serum concentrations of 50 ng/mL or greater; 36 patients had lower concentrations. Patients at greater than the 50-ng/mL threshold had (i) lower mean HAMD-17 sum scores from day 7 to end point (P e 0.018 for each analysis); (ii) a more pronounced HAMD-17 decrease (P e 0.019 for each analysis), and (iii) 23 days' shorter duration of hospitalization (P = 0.033) than patients with levels of citalopram less than 50 ng/mL. As regards adverse effects, both patient groups were not significantly different. Despite therapeutic doses, a significant number of patients had serum concentrations less than 50 ng/mL, and these were associated with an unfavorable treatment outcome; therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended to optimize dosing citalopram in the early phase of treatment.

It is concluded that treatment with citalopram should be guided by symptom rating at baseline and on day 14 and serum concentration determination on day 7.

The data taken together indicate that TDM-guided dosing of citalopram has the potential to be cost effective by reducing the length of hospitalization.

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of tricyclic antidepressants (TCA) is established in the treatment of depression to optimize outcome and safety. However, there are few reports on TDM under naturalistic clinical conditions. In the present study, we investigated a TDM group (TDM) and a randomly assigned parallel group without TDM (no-TDM) while on TCA treatment. Serum levels were analyzed in both cohorts, but feedback and dose recommendation were only provided for the TDM group. Serum levels of TCA were assessed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The outcome was measured weekly using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD), the Clinical Global Impressions Scale (CGI), and the UKU side-effect scale. 84 patients with depressive disorder according to DSM-IV were recruited in three centers (TDM, n = 43; no-TDM, n = 41; mean age 49.9 +/- 13.2 years, 63.1 % female). Patients were treated with either amitriptyline (n = 69) or doxepin (n = 15); the mean dosage at endpoint was 126 +/- 35 mg and 155 +/- 47 mg, respectively. The mean study duration was 21 +/- 8 days. Both groups improved according to HAMD (from 25.2 +/- 8.4 at baseline to 12.0 +/- 7.4 at endpoint) and CGI scores (68 % responders). Moderately severe or severe side effects occurred in 16 % of patients. Adequate dose adjustment was significantly higher in the TDM group (60 % vs. 46 %, p < 0.05); this led to a significantly higher rate of therapeutic serum levels in the TDM group (58 % vs. 44 %, p < 0.05). Direct effects of TDM were not found for effectiveness. Therapeutic TCA serum levels over weeks one to three, however, were associated with significantly better outcome at endpoint (p < 0.05) as measured with changes in the HAMD or CGI response rates from baseline to endpoint. Finally, considerable side effects occurred significantly more often when serum levels were above the therapeutic range (27 % vs. 11 %; p < 0.01). We conclude that treating depression with TCA can be optimized by early TDM, which is superior to clinical judgment on its own. Since the psychiatrists in charge were less than completely "compliant" to the recommendations provided together with serum levels, the effect could be more pronounced than this study shows. The results encourage further studies in order to optimize antidepressant pharmacotherapy when using TDM appropriately.

The recently reported differences between pulmonary and extrapulmonary acute respiratory distress syndromes (ARDS(p), ARDS(exp)) are the main reasons of scientific discussion on potential differences in the effects of current ventilatory strategies. The aim of this study is to assess whether the presence of ARDS(p) or ARDS(exp) can differently affect the beneficial effects of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) upon physiological and clinical parameters. Thirty adults fulfilling the ARDS criteria were indicated for HFOV in case of failure of conventional ventilation strategy. According to the ARDS type, each patient was included either in the group of patients with ARDS(p) or ARDS(exp). Six hours after normocapnic HFOV introduction, there was no significant increase in PaO2/F(I)O2 in ARDS(p) group (from 129+/-47 to 133+/-50 Torr), but a significant improvement was found in ARDS(exp) (from 114+/-54 to 200+/-65 Torr, p<0.01). Despite the insignificant difference in the latest mean airway pressure (MAP) on conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) between both groups, initial optimal continuous distension pressure (CDP) for the best PaO2/F(I)O2 during HFOV was 2.0+/-0.6 kPa in ARDS(p) and 2.8+/-0.6 kPa in ARDS(exp) (p<0.01). HFOV recruits and thus it is more effective in ARDS(exp). ARDS(exp) patients require higher CDP levels than ARDS(p) patients. The testing period for positive effect of HFOV is recommended not to be longer than 24 hours.