We address the general question of what is the best statistical strategy to adapt in order to search efficiently for randomly located objects ('target sites'). It is often assumed in foraging theory that the flight lengths of a forager have a characteristic scale: from this assumption gaussian, Rayleigh and other classical distributions with well-defined variances have arisen. However, such theories cannot explain the long-tailed power-law distributions of flight lengths or flight times that are observed experimentally. Here we study how the search efficiency depends on the probability distribution of flight lengths taken by a forager that can detect target sites only in its limited vicinity. We show that, when the target sites are sparse and can be visited any number of times, an inverse square power-law distribution of flight lengths, corresponding to Lévy flight motion, is an optimal strategy. We test the theory by analysing experimental foraging data on selected insect, mammal and bird species, and find that they are consistent with the predicted inverse square power-law distributions.
The study of animal foraging behaviour is of practical ecological importance 1 , and exemplifies the wider scientific problem of optimizing search strategies 2 .Lévy flights are random walks whose step lengths come from probability distributions with heavy power-law tails 3, 4 , such that clusters of short steps are connected by rare long steps. flight durations (time intervals between landing on the ocean) were then calculated as consecutive hours for which a bird remained dry, to a resolution of 1 h. It was assumed that birds landed on the water solely to feed, and that flight durations were thus indicative of distances between prey.Time series for 19 separate foraging trips 7 were pooled to give a total of 363 3 flights. The resulting log-log histogram of flight durations gave a straight line with a slope of approximately 2, and is reproduced in Supplementary Fig. 1 from the original raw data. The crux of the conclusion that the albatrosses were performing Lévy flights was that the slope of 2 implied the probability density function (pdf) of flight durations t (in hours), was 7, 10for t ≥ 1 h (leaving out the normalization constant). This is consistent with the Lévy flight definition that the tail of the pdf is of the power-law form t −µ , where 1 < µ ≤ 3 (though technically this is a Lévy walk 4,7,22 We first analyze a newer, larger, and higher resolution data set of albatross flight durations to test for Lévy flights. In 2004, 20 wandering albatrosses on BirdIsland were each fitted with a salt-water logger and a GPS device. The GPS data were too infrequent (at most one location h −1 ) to give distances between landings, but were needed to estimate each bird's departure time from Bird Island, in order to calculate the duration of the initial flight before first landing on the water (we calculated return flights similarly). The resulting data set of flight records was 4 pooled, as in ref. 7, yielding a total of 1416 flights to a resolution of 10 s (Fig. 1).The flights ≥ 1 h are clearly inconsistent with coming from the power law t −2 ascertained 7 for the 1992 data. Furthermore, data from a power law of any exponent (not just 2) would yield a straight line 23 , and this is clearly not the case.In fact, the flight durations t (in h) are consistent with coming from the shifted gamma distribution given by the pdfwhere y = t − 1/120 accounts for the assumed 30 s period before the bird searches for new food sources (see Methods), s = 0.31 is the shape parameter, r = 0.41 h −1 is the rate parameter, and Γ(·) is the gamma function. Equation (2) is valid for flights >30 s; for shorter flights we have f (t) = 0. The exponential term of (2) dominates for large t, implying Poisson behaviour, such that for long enough flights the birds essentially encounter prey randomly with a constant low probability.A Brownian random walker's displacement increases as t H where H = 1/2.If H > 1/2, we have "superdiffusion" as originally inferred in Fig. 2a The gamma distribution (2) has µ = 1 − s = 0.69. This is such a slow powerlaw ...
Recent advances in spatial ecology have improved our understanding of the role of large-scale animal movements. However, an unsolved problem concerns the inherent stochasticity involved in many animal search displacements and its possible adaptive value. When animals have no information about where targets (i.e., resource patches, mates, etc.) are located, different random search strategies may provide different chances to find them. Assuming random-walk models as a necessary tool to understand how animals face such environmental uncertainty, we analyze the statistical differences between two random-walk models commonly used to fit animal movement data, the Lévy walks and the correlated random walks, and we quantify their efficiencies (i.e., the number of targets found in relation to total displacement) within a random search context. Correlated random-walk properties (i.e., scale-finite correlations) may be interpreted as the by-product of locally scanning mechanisms. Lévy walks, instead, have fundamental properties (i.e., super-diffusivity and scale invariance) that allow a higher efficiency in random search scenarios. Specific biological mechanisms related to how animals punctuate their movement with sudden reorientations in a random search would be sufficient to sustain Lévy walk properties. Furthermore, we investigate a new model (the Lévy-modulated correlated random walk) that combines the properties of correlated and Lévy walks. This model shows that Lévy walk properties are robust to any behavioral mechanism providing short-range correlations in the walk. We propose that some animals may have evolved the ability of performing Lévy walks as adaptive strategies in order to face search uncertainties.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.