Variation in tolerance of soil acidity among 40 rhizobial strains was assessed in greenhouse trials in which the strains were applied as separate seed inoculants (5 ✕104 cells per seed) to two cultivars of mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) and performance was measured by nodulation, growth, and N‐yield of the host plant. The plants grew in a low N, low Ca acid subsoil, Goldridge fine sandy loam (Typic Hapludult, fine loamy, mixed, mesic), left at its natural pH of 5.0 (saturation paste) or limed with CaCO3 to pH 6.3. Each pH ✕ strain treatment was triplicated in separate pots.
Strains demonstrated a large and perhaps continuous variation in acid tolerance. A few were very sensitive: they failed to nodulate at pH 5.0. About half were moderately sensitive: nodulation and growth were significantly impaired at pH 5.0. The remainder were tolerant: like NH4NO3 they supported similar plant growth at both soil pH values. Some strains combined high tolerance with high effectiveness.
A strain's acid tolerance could not be predicted from the abundance or effectiveness with which it nodulated at favorable pH, or from its growth rate or acid production in conventional yeast mannitol medium.
A few strains were sensitive on one host cultivar and tolerant on the other, implying that acid tolerances of symbiotic legumes cannot be compared validly in trials with only one inoculant.
SUMMARYGreenhouse experiments were done with two purposes: (1) to identify strains of rhizobia effective and acid-tolerant in symbiosis with Lablab purpureus, and (2) to determine whether soil acidity or the symbiotic condition increased the phosphate requirement for growth.Five rhizobial strains were tested in one neutral soil, two acid soils, and the two acid soils limed to pH 6.6. In the neutral and limed soils, three of the strains were effective (CB1024, CB756, TALl69), but only two strains (CB756, TALl69) remained effective in acid soil.Strain CB756 and plus-N treatments were further compared in a factorial trial involving combinations of five levels of P with lime, no lime and CaClz treatments, applied to an acid soil. Some of the treatments were also applied to plants inoculated with CB1024. Between the N-fertilized and CB756 treatments there was no clear difference in growth response to applied P, and the critical internal concentration of P for 95~ of maximal growth was the same (0.22~ shoot dry weight). Increasing P beyond levels needed for maximal growth increased nodulation and N concentration in plants inoculated with CB756. It lowered N concentration in N-fertilized plants. There was evidence suggesting that the P requirement of symbiotic plants increased if the soil was acid, or if CB756 were replaced by CB1024 as microsymbiont; but the critical statistical interactions were not significant.
SUMMARYIn order to explore interrelations between S nutrition, soluble sugars, leaf area, nodulation and N 2 fixation, greenhouse experiments were done with several levels of S added to perlite-sand cultures or to a moderately S-deficient soil. Sulfur had indirect effects on nodulation and N 2 fixation, possibly by improving sugars supply and N metabolism.In perlite-sand culture, leaf area increased with concentrations of supplied S up to 50 and 200 ~M for symbiotic and N-treated plants respectively, then decreased at higher concentrations. Plant yield and total sugars content (mg per plant) for the N-treated plants behaved similar to leaf area in response to added S but in the symbiotic plants maximum values were obtained at 100 laM S. In soil, Mo had no effect on growth but interacted significantly with S in affecting total sugars content. High levels of S depressed sugars content at low Mo but raised it at high Mo.Sulfur increased the N content of soil-grown plants. It increased the N content of plants grown in perlite-sand culture except at very high levels of S. There was little effect on concentration of N in the shoots. Nitrogen content correlated significantly with leaf area and sugar content, and highly significantly with S concentration in the shoots.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.