As a result of increasing interest in non-surgical treatment for the reduction of goitre size the use of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for volume estimation of large multinodular goitres was evaluated in 20 patients (three males and 17 females; age 61 +/- 21 years) with a multinodular goitre larger than 100 ml. In addition, MR measurements were compared with scintigraphic (SC) volume estimations. Intraobserver coefficient of variation (CV) of MR measurements was 2.2 +/- 2.0% (Observer 1) and interobserver CV 4.1 +/- 2.2% (Observers 1 and 2). In all 20 patients signs of mechanical complications were shown on MR images. For SC measurements intraobserver CV was 7.5 +/- 5.7% (Observer 3) and 5.4 +/- 5.1% (Observer 4). Interobserver CV was 10.1 +/- 6.1%. The correlation between measurements with both methods was not strong (r = 0.665) and the resulting CV was 17.3 +/- 14.2%. Underestimation of SC volumes could not be explained by the presence of cysts on the surface of the thyroid. It is concluded that MR imaging can be used for in vivo thyroid volume estimation in large multinodular goitres. The high precision of MR measurements makes this technique potentially useful for the evaluation of thyroid growth and non-surgical treatment for reducing goitre size. Scintigraphic volume measurements do not suffice for this purpose. An additional advantage of MR imaging is the detailed anatomical information it provides with regard to mechanical complications of large goitres.

Background and Objectives: Preoperative planning utilizing computed tomographies (CT) is of utmost importance in functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). Frequently, no uniform documentation and planning structures are available to residents in training. Consequently, overall completeness and quality of operation planning may vary greatly. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the impact of a structured operation planning (SOP) approach on the report quality and user convenience during a 4-day sinus surgery course. Materials and Methods: Fifteen participant were requested to plan a FESS procedure based on a CT scan of the paranasal sinuses that exhibited common pathological features, in a conventional manner, using a free text. Afterwards, the participants reevaluated the same scans by means of a specifically designed structured reporting template. Two experienced ENT surgeons assessed the collected conventional operation planning (COP) and SOP methods independently with regard to time requirements, overall quality, and legibility. User convenience data were collected by utilizing visual analogue scales. Results: A significantly greater time expenditure was associated with SOPs (183 s vs. 297 s, p = 0.0003). Yet, legibility (100% vs. 72%, p < 0.0001) and overall completeness (61.3% vs. 22.7%, p < 0.0001) of SOPs was significantly superior to COPs. Additionally, description of highly relevant variants in anatomy and pathologies were outlined in greater detail. User convenience data delineated a significant preference for SOPs (VAS 7.9 vs. 6.9, p = 0.0185). Conclusions: CT-based planning of FESS procedures by residents in training using a structured approach is more time-consuming while producing a superior report quality in terms of detailedness and readability. Consequently, SOP can be considered as a valuable tool in the process of preoperative evaluations, especially within residency.

No abstract

No abstract