SummaryBackground : Antibiotics and thiopurines have been employed in the management of fistulizing Crohn's disease, although evidence of their efficacy is rare.Aim : To evaluate, in a prospective, open‐label study, the influence of antibiotics and azathioprine on the clinical outcome of perianal fistulas in patients with Crohn's disease.Methods : Fifty‐two patients entered the study, starting with an 8‐week regimen of ciprofloxacin (500–1000 mg/day) and/or metronidazole (1000–1500 mg/day). Seventeen patients had already received daily azathioprine (2–2.5 mg/kg) at enrolment, whereas in 14 patients azathioprine was initiated after 8 weeks of antibiotic treatment. Outcome was evaluated by Fistula Drainage Assessment and the Perianal Disease Activity Index at weeks 8 and 20.Results : Overall, 26 patients (50%) responded to antibiotic treatment, with complete healing in 25% of patients at week 8. The Perianal Disease Activity Index decreased significantly from 8.4 ± 2.9 to 6.0 ± 4.0 (P < 0.0001). At week 20, the outcome was assessed in 49 patients (94%), 29 of whom (59%) had received azathioprine. Response was noted in 17 of the 49 patients (35%), with complete healing in nine patients (18%). Patients who received azathioprine were more likely to achieve a response (48%) than those without immunosuppression (15%) (P = 0.03). The Perianal Disease Activity Index was closely associated with treatment response and perianal disease activity.Conclusion : Antibiotics are useful to induce a short‐term response in perianal Crohn's disease, and may provide a bridging strategy to azathioprine, which seems to be essential for the maintenance of fistula improvement.
SUMMARYBackground: Conventional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs have been associated with an increased risk of exacerbation of inflammatory bowel disease. Aim: To evaluate, in a prospective, open-label study, the safety and efficacy of a 20-day regimen of the selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitor, rofecoxib, 12.5-25 mg/day, in inflammatory bowel disease patients with associated peripheral arthropathy and/or arthritis. Methods: Patients with clinically inactive to mild inflammatory bowel disease and a joint pain score of at least two points on a scale ranging from zero (none) to four (very poor) were eligible. Response was defined by a decrease of at least two points in the arthralgia score.
NIRS-guided BACP during MHCA allows a safe approach to complex aortic arch surgery. The drop of brain oxygenation values in the contralateral hemisphere during unilateral ACP strongly suggests the routine use of BACP, when circulatory arrest under tepid temperatures is used.
The increasing number of interventions for percutaneous aortic valve replacement (AVR) justify a renewed evaluation of one-year survival rates after open AVR with and without coronary artery bypass in octogenarians. Risk factors influencing mortality are compared, and the patients' quality-of-life (QoL) after one year is assessed. One hundred and fifty-four patients (102 females, 52 males) aged on average 82.9±2.5 years, who had undergone open bioprosthetic AVR with (n=80) and without (n=74) coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) between January 2005 and December 2007 were reviewed retrospectively. Risk factors for mortality were analyzed. The patient's QoL after one year was evaluated by administering the Seattle Angina Questionnaire on the telephone. The mean in-hospital mortality rate was 7.8%. The 12-month survival rate was 81.8%. Preoperative risk factors revealed no difference between survivors and non-survivors: renal insufficiency, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes, cerebrovascular disease (CVD), peripheral vascular disease, logistic EuroSCORE and concomitant CABG. Assessment of QoL revealed a substantial improvement of physical fitness in all 126 patients. Surgery in the aortic valve without CABG is associated with a good outcome. The improvement in QoL after one year supports the decision to operate on patients older than 80 years of age.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.