No abstract

The recent focus on racial inequalities highlights the need to evaluate and address systemic biases (often unrecognized and unintended) affecting minority groups in health care. Specific to pediatric heart transplantation, disparities in outcomes have been documented in national registry studies with lower survival after listing and transplantation in non-White patients. [1][2][3][4] However, registry databases do not extend to the time before waitlisting for transplantation. Therefore, the potential for bias in the pediatric heart transplant candidate referral and evaluation process has been understudied.We retrospectively studied our single-center experience evaluating

No abstract

Despite the increasing effectiveness of PCI for localized ACD, the survival after development of advanced ACD remains poor. Stents appear to increase effectiveness of PCI for ACD, but other factors in the current era contribute to improved outcomes.

Background Our pediatric heart transplant center transitioned from post‐bypass basiliximab (BAS) induction to either anti‐thymocyte globulin (ATG) or pre‐bypass BAS. The purpose of this study was to compare first‐year rejection rates before and after this change. Methods A single‐center retrospective analysis was conducted of pediatric heart transplant recipients from 2010 to 2019. Primary outcome was first‐year rejection. Bivariate analysis, Kaplan‐Meier curves, and multivariable regression were performed across eras. Results Forty‐three early era patients (55%) received post‐bypass BAS, and 35 late era patients (45%) received pre‐bypass BAS (n = 17) or ATG (n = 18). First‐year rejection decreased in the late era (31% vs 53%, p = .05). This finding was more pronounced after excluding infants (38% vs 73%, p = .006). Late era was associated with a decreased likelihood of rejection (all cohort OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.05‐0.66; infants excluded OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.04‐0.61). No differences in post‐transplant lymphoproliferative disease, donor‐specific antibody, or infection were observed. Conclusions Fewer late era patients receiving ATG or pre‐bypass BAS induction had first‐year rejection compared to the early era patients receiving standard post‐bypass BAS induction. This programmatic shift in induction strategy was readily achievable and potentially effective in reducing first‐year rejection.