No abstract

Objective-To evaluate the eVectiveness of a nurse led shared care programme to improve coronary heart disease risk factor levels and general health status and to reduce anxiety and depression in patients awaiting coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Design-Randomised controlled trial. Setting-Community, January 1997 to March 1998. Study groups-98 (75 male) consecutive patients were recruited to the study within one month of joining the waiting list for elective CABG at Glasgow Royal Infirmary University NHS Trust. Patients were randomly assigned to usual care (control; n = 49) or a nurse led intervention programme (n = 49). Intervention-A shared care programme consisting of health education and motivational interviews, according to individual need, was carried out monthly. Care was provided in the patients' own homes by the community based cardiac liaison nurse alternating with the general practice nurse at the practice clinic. Outcome measures-Smoking status, obesity, physical activity, anxiety and depression, general health status, and proportion of patients exceeding target values for blood pressure, plasma cholesterol, and alcohol intake. Results-Compared with patients who received usual care, those participating in the nurse led programme were more likely to stop smoking (25% v 2%, p = 0.001) and to reduce obesity (body mass index > 30 kg/m 2 ) (16.3% v 8.1%, p = 0.01). Target systolic blood pressure improved by 19.8% compared with a 10.7% decrease in the control group (p = 0.001) and target diastolic blood pressure improved by 21.5% compared with 10.2% in the control group (p = 0.000). However, there was no significant diVerence between groups in the proportion of patients with cholesterol concentrations exceeding target values. There was a significant improvement in general health status scores across all eight domains of the 36 item short form health survey with changes in diVerence in mean scores between the groups ranging from 8.1 (p = 0.005) to 36.1 (p < 0.000). Levels of anxiety and depression improved (p < 0.000) and there was improvement in time spent being physically active (p < 0.000). Conclusions-This nurse led shared care intervention was shown to be eVective for improving care for patients on the waiting list for CABG. (Heart 2001;86:317-323) Keywords: coronary artery bypass grafting; coronary heart disease risk; nurse led shared care; risk reduction Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery has been shown to be a highly eVective intervention for the relief of angina, improving quality of life and for some patients prolonging life. [1][2][3][4] There has been a 10-fold increase in CABG surgery procedures in the UK, from approximately 3000 a year in 1977, either as a single procedure or together with another cardiac procedure, to almost 25 000 operations in 1995.5 In Scotland, rates of CABG are among the highest in the UK, at 448 operations per million of the population in 1995. The national guaranteed maximum waiting time is one year with a mean waiting time on National Health ...

The diurnal rhythms of plasma epinephrine and norepinephrine were investigated in a group of normal young men. Sleep, posture, illumination, and food intake were monitored. Plasma epinephrine demonstrated a statistically significant diurnal rhythm, with a mean amplitude of 14 +/- 1.6 (+/- SE) pg/ml superimposed on a mean level of 43 +/- 5.3 pg/ml. The trough occurred at 03.20 h +/- 35 min. Plasma norepinephrine had a significant diurnal rhythm, with a mean amplitude of 111 +/- 19 pg/ml superimposed on a mean level of 413 +/- 25 pg/ml, with the trough occurring at 02.20 h +/- 30 min. There was a significant correlation between the two rhythms at zero phase shift, with a pooled value for the group of r = 0.49. Epinephrine levels had no direct relationship to sleep or posture, whereas norepinephrine levels were significantly higher with upright posture and higher when the men were awake than when asleep. Our results indicate that circadian variations in the sympathetic-adrenal medullary system are not explained by a single controlling influence and that the norepinephrine rhythm can be accounted for as a direct response to changes in posture and sleep, whereas the epinephrine rhythm is probably controlled by a circadian oscillator.