To cite this article: Manco-Johnson MJ, Kempton CL, Reding MT, Lissitchkov T, Goranov S, Gercheva L, Rusen L, Ghinea M, Uscatescu V, Rescia V, Hong W. Randomized, controlled, parallel-group trial of routine prophylaxis vs. on-demand treatment with sucrose-formulated recombinant factor VIII in adults with severe hemophilia A (SPINART). J Thromb Haemost 2013; 11: 1119-27.Summary. Background: The benefits of routine prophylaxis vs. on-demand treatment with factor VIII products have not been evaluated in controlled clinical trials in older patients with hemophilia A. Objectives: To report results from a preplanned analysis of data from the first year of the 3-year SPINART study, which compares routine prophylaxis with on-demand treatment with sucroseformulated recombinant FVIII (rFVIII-FS). Patients/ Methods: SPINART is an open-label, randomized, controlled, parallel-group, multinational trial. Males aged 12-50 years with severe hemophilia A, ! 150 days of exposure to FVIII, no FVIII inhibitors, no prophylaxis for > 12 consecutive months in the past 5 years and 6-24 bleeding episodes in the preceding 6 months were randomized 1 : 1 to rFVIII-FS prophylaxis (25 IU kg À1 , three times weekly) or on-demand treatment. The primary efficacy endpoint, number of total bleeding episodes in the intent-to-treat population, was analyzed after the last patient had completed 1 year of follow-up. A negative binomial model was used for the primary endpoint analysis; analysis of variance was used for confirmatory analysis of annualized bleeding rates. Results: Eighty-four patients were enrolled and analyzed (n = 42 per group; mean age, 30.6 years; median treatment duration, 1.7 years). The median number of total bleeding episodes and total bleeding episodes per year were significantly lower with prophylaxis than with on-demand treatment (total, 0 vs. 54.5; total per year, 0 vs. 27.9; both P < 0.0001). No treatmentrelated adverse events occurred, and no patients developed FVIII inhibitors. Conclusions: Routine prophylaxis with rFVIII-FS leads to a significant reduction in bleeding as compared with on-demand treatment. Adverse events were consistent with the established rFVIII-FS safety profile.

The Joint Outcome Study Investigators 7Recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) is a promising gene delivery vector and has recently been used in patients with hemophilia. One limitation of AAV application is that most humans have experienced wild-type AAV serotype 2 exposure, which frequently generates neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) that may inhibit rAAV2 vector transduction. Employing alternative serotypes of rAAV vectors may circumvent this problem. We investigated the development of NAbs in early childhood by examining sera gathered prospectively from 62 children with hemophilia A, participating in a multi-institutional hemophilia clinical trial (the Joint Outcome Study). Clinical applications in hemophilia therapy have been suggested for serotypes AAV2, AAV5 and AAV8, therefore NAbs against these serotypes were serially assayed over a median follow-up of 4 years. NAbs prevalence increased during early childhood for all serotypes. NAbs against AAV2 (43.5%) were observed more frequently and at higher titers compared with both AAV5 (25.8%) and AAV8 (22.6%). NAbs against AAV5 or AAV8 were rarely observed in the absence of co-prevalent and higher titer AAV2 NAbs, suggesting that NAbs to AAV5 and AAV8 were detected following AAV2 exposure due to partial cross-reactivity of AAV2-directed NAbs. The results may guide rational design of clinical trials using alternative AAV serotypes and suggest that younger patients who are given AAV gene therapy will benefit from the lower prevalence of NAbs.

Evaluation of prophylactic treatment of haemophilia requires sensitive methods. To design and test a new magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scale for haemophilic arthropathy, two scales of a combined MRI scoring scheme were merged into a single scale which includes soft tissue and osteochondral subscores. Sixty-one joint MRI's of 46 patients with haemophilia were evaluated by four radiologists using the new and older scales. Forty-six of the joints were evaluated using two X-ray scales. For all MRI scores, interreader agreement and correlations with X-ray scores and lifetime number of haemarthroses were analysed. The interreader agreement intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.82, 0.89 and 0.88 for the soft tissue and osteochondral subscores and the total score, as evaluated according to the new MRI scale, compared to 0.80 and 0.89 as for the older scales. The total score and osteochondral subscore according to the new scale, as well as scores according to the older scales were correlated (P < 0.01) with number of haemarthroses (Spearman correlation 0.35-0.68) and with the X-ray scores (Spearman correlation 0.40-0.76), but no correlation (P > 0.05) was found between the soft tissue subscore of the new MRI scale and the X-ray scores. The new MRI scale is simpler to apply than the older and has similar reader reliability and correlation with lifetime number of haemarthroses, and by separating soft tissue and osteochondral changes it gives additional information. The new scale is useful for analyses of early and moderate stages of arthropathy, and may help to evaluate prophylactic haemophilia treatment.

Summary.  This review of published studies was conducted to derive data on patients with congenital fibrinogen deficiency (CFD), including dosing of fibrinogen replacement therapy, outcome, and adverse events, either temporally related or distant to fibrinogen replacement, in order to assist clinicians in developing treatment plans for patients with CFD. A systematic review was performed of case reports identified by a MEDLINE search between 1961 and 2010. Eligible studies included subjects with a diagnosis of CFD who received fibrinogen replacement. An attempt was made to extract dose, frequency, duration, hemostatic efficacy and adverse events such as thrombosis or allergic reactions. Reported thrombotic events distant from fibrinogen replacement were also recorded. From 104 papers reviewed, a total of 50 cases were identified: afibrinogenemia (35), hypofibrinogenemia (6), and dysfibrinogenemia (9). Fibrinogen replacement therapy was generally effective in preventing or treating bleeding in doses adequate to achieve and maintain fibrinogen activity above 50–100 mg dL−1 (non‐surgical and obstetric use) or 100–200 mg dL−1 (surgical prophylaxis). Increased fibrinogen clearance was observed with massive hemorrhage, major surgery, and advanced pregnancy. Obstetric outcomes were optimized when fibrinogen replacement was initiated prior to conception. Uncontrolled hemorrhage, allergic reactions and antibody formation were rare events. However, thromboses, both related and unrelated to fibrinogen replacement, occurred in 15 of 50 (30%) patients overall, and in eight of 12 (67%) adult non‐obstetric patients with afibrinogenemia. Published fibrinogen replacement regimens are presented for 50 CFD patients. Fibrinogen replacement therapy requires careful monitoring of fibrinogen levels. Afibrinogenemia is associated with thromboembolic complications with or without treatment.

Background Limited data exist on the impact of prophylaxis on adults with severe hemophilia A and pre-existing joint disease. Objectives To describe 3-year bleeding, joint health and structure, health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) and other outcomes from the open-label, randomized, multinational SPINART study. Patients/Methods Males aged 12-50 years with severe hemophilia A, ≥ 150 factor VIII exposure days, no inhibitors and no prophylaxis for > 12 consecutive months in the past 5 years were randomized to sucrose-formulated recombinant FVIII prophylaxis or on-demand therapy (OD). Data collected included total and joint bleeding events (BEs), joint structure (magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]), joint health (Colorado Adult Joint Assessment Scale [CAJAS]), HRQoL, pain, healthcare resource utilization (HRU), activity, and treatment satisfaction. Results Following 3 years of prophylaxis, adults maintained excellent adherence, with a 94% reduction in BEs despite severe pre-existing arthropathy; 35.7% and 76.2% of prophylaxis participants were bleed-free or had fewer than two BEs per year, respectively. As compared with OD, prophylaxis was associated with improved CAJAS scores (least squares [LS] mean, - 0.31 [n = 42] versus + 0.63 [n = 42]) and HAEMO-QoL-A scores (LS mean, + 3.98 [n = 41] versus - 6.00 [n = 42]), less chronic pain (50% decrease), and approximately two-fold less HRU; activity, Euro QoL-5D-3L (EQ-5D-3L) scores and satisfaction scores also favored prophylaxis. However, MRI score changes were not different for prophylaxis versus OD (LS mean, + 0.79 [n = 41] versus + 0.96 [n = 38]). Conclusions Over a period of 3 years, prophylaxis versus OD in adults with severe hemophilia A and arthropathy led to decreased bleeding, pain, and HRU, better joint health, activity, satisfaction, and HRQoL, but no reduction in structural arthropathy progression, suggesting that pre-existing joint arthropathy may be irreversible.