Studies of human native C-reactive protein (nCRP) in mice have shown effects ranging from proatherogenic, to antiatherogenic, to no effect. It is likely that these disparities are related to (a) the use, in some studies, of contaminated nCRP, or to (b) variation in CRP levels associated with either its episodic administration or the use of CRP-transgenic mice. In our study, 12-week-old male apolipoprotein E-deficient (apoE (-/-)) mice, maintained on a Western diet, received azide- and endotoxin-free nCRP (n = 23) or placebo (n = 23) continuously via osmotic pumps (20.4 microg/day) for 4 weeks. CRP-treated and control mice developed similar atherosclerotic lesions in whole aortas (nCRP: 10.4 +/- 4.7% vs. controls: 11.7 +/- 4.4%, P = 0.76) and aortic roots (nCRP: 65.0 +/- 7.8% vs. controls: 64.7 +/- 9.7%, P = 0.94). No differences were observed in macrophage or T-lymphocyte infiltrates and there was no meaningful change in VCAM-1 or IL-6 expression, in the levels of soluble VCAM-1, or in circulating proinflammatory (IL-1 beta, IL-6, IL-12p40, IL-12p70, TNF-alpha, and INF-gamma), or anti-inflammatory (IL-4 and IL-10) cytokines. We conclude that continuous infusion of uncontaminated nCRP in apoE (-/-) mice is not associated with increased atherosclerosis, does not alter systemic or local inflammation, and does not affect endothelial activation. These observations suggest that alternative approaches to study CRP (perhaps using different pentraxins in the mouse model or using a rabbit model instead of a mouse model) are needed to evaluate the effects of pentraxins on atherosclerosis.

Background/Aims: Several inflammatory biomarkers have been found to be associated with cardiovascular disease or all-cause mortality in dialysis patients, but their usefulness in clinical practice or as surrogate endpoints is not certain. The purpose of the present study was to determine the intrapatient variation of C-reactive protein, IL-6, fetuin-A and albumin in a population of dialysis patients. Methods: Apparently healthy dialysis patients with either a tunneled dialysis catheter or fistula had monthly assessments of these biomarkers for a total of four determinations, and the intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated as measures of intersubject variance. Results: Our results showed large within-subject variation relative to the total variation in the measurements (31–46%). Having a tunneled catheter as opposed to a fistula was not significantly associated with mean levels, suggesting that chronic subclinical catheter infection does not explain the variation seen in the biomarkers. In contrast, there was a rapid change in these biomarkers with a clinically apparent acute infection. Conclusion: These results suggest that these biomarkers have limitations for use as surrogate endpoints in clinical trials due to wide fluctuations, even in apparently clinically healthy individuals.

No abstract