The relation between porosity and permeability parameters in carbonated rocks is complicated and indistinct. Flow units are defined with aim of better understanding reservoir unit flow behavior and relation between porosity and permeability. Flow units reflect a group of rocks with same geological and physical properties which affect fluid flow, but they do not necessarily coincide with boundary of facies. In each flow unit homogeneity of data is preserved and this homogeneity fades in the boundaries. Here, in this study, three methods are used for identification of flow units and estimation of average porosity and permeability in three wells of Tabnaak gas field located in south of Iran. These methods include Testerman statistical zonation, flow zone index (FZI), and cluster analysis. To identify these units, compilation of core porosity and permeability are used. After comparing results of flow units developed by these three methods, a good accordance in permeable zones was obtained for them, but for general evaluation of flow units in field scale, the methods of FZI and cluster analysis are more relevant than Testerman statistical zonation.

No abstract

The relation between porosity and permeability parameters in carbonated rocks is complicated and indistinct. Flow units are defined with aim of better understanding reservoir unit flow behavior and relation between porosity and permeability. Flow-units reflect a group of rocks with same geological and physical properties which affect fluid flow, but they do not necessarily coincide with boundary of facies. In each flow-unit homogeneity of data preserved and this homogeneity fades in the boundaries. Here in this study three methods are used for identification of flowunits and estimation of average porosity and permeability in three wells of Tabnaak gas field located in south of Iran. These methods include Testerman statistical zonation, flow zone index (FZI), and cluster Analysis. To identify these units, compilation of core porosity and permeability are used. After comparing results of flow units developed by these three methods, a good accordance in permeable zones obtained for them, but for general evaluation of flowunits in field scale, the methods of FZI and cluster analysis are more relevant than Testerman statistical zonation. an open access journal cluster analysis in field scale is difficult if not impossible. Therefor in order to characterize general situation and flow regime of reservoir in field scale, applying flow-units identified by Testerman method is easier and faster.Only core permeability data is used in Testerman method, therefor we face more limitations for recognizing zones with more seperativity potential, and also the number of yielded flow-units is less than the two other methods.