metastatic colorectal cancer and to examine the relationship between this phenomenon and survival rate of the patients.Methods: After receiving IRB approval, clinical information was collected on patients with metastatic colorectal cancer whose tumors exhibited RAS mutation and who were treated between 2010-2020 at Shamir Medical Center or Sourasky Medical Center. After calculating the ratio of the mutant allele and the wild-type allele, the tumours were classified as either MASI positive or MASI negative. We studied the prevalence of the RAS MASI phenomenon and looked for its effect on three variables: overall survival, disease-free survival and one-year survival.Results: We collected molecular and clinical information on 88 patients. The prevalence of RAS MASI among all patients in the study was 38.6%. Among the group of patients who were initially diagnosed with metastatic disease (stage 4), the incidence was higher and reached 47.7%. In terms of survival after one year, we found a statistically insignificant difference between the MASI group and the non-MASI group in the patients who first presented with stage 4 disease. The survival rate in the MASI group after one year was 76.3%, compared with 56.3% in the non-MASI group.Conclusions: RAS MASI is a clinically significant phenomenon among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and a strong signal was seen in patients whose disease was initially diagnosed with distant metastasis. Among these patients, RAS MASI may be a negative prognostic factor in the first year of diagnosis, however further research is important to lead to statistically significant results.Legal entity responsible for the study: The authors.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.