No abstract

It is widely accepted that diagnostic ultrasound has the potential to elevate the temperature of tissue being scanned. Because both the maximum value of the temperature rise and the temporal profile of that rise are necessary to estimate the risk correctly, the temperature rise [DeltaT(t)] at an observation point for an exposure condition is presumed to have two components, that is, DeltaT(t)=DeltaT(max)X(t). The amplitude component DeltaT(max) is the maximum value of DeltaT(t), and the exposure time component X(t) represents the time dependency of that DeltaT(t). Ninety-six cases were investigated to obtain the proposed DeltaT(t) model at six frequencies, four source diameters, and four f-numbers. Then, using the relative change in the rate of induction of a thermal effect due to ultrasound exposure that produces DeltaT(t) different from a threshold exposure, the safe use time (SUT) model was constructed. SUT informs the user of the maximum duration of exposure in a region at a particular output level that would be no more hazardous than scanning at the threshold exposure. Using the SUT model, high power ultrasound can be applied for a short time so that the user can improve imaging performance while staying within safe limits.

In recent theoretical studies, the temperature rise produced by diagnostic ultrasound was estimated by solving the Bioheat Transfer Equation (BHTE) but ignoring the initial temperature rise. The temperature rise was determined in our study by the BHTE including an initial temperature rise. We discuss how the initial temperature rise occurs during an ultrasound examination, and how the initial temperature rise affects subsequent ultrasound heating. We theoretically show that the temperature rise produced by the ultrasound examination (exposure time of 500 s) in a tissue sample having an initial temperature rise was higher than that in a tissue sample with no initial temperature rise that was exposed to ultrasound (exposure time of 1200 s). The theoretical results for these two cases were 5.64 degrees C and 3.58 degrees C, respectively. In our experimental study, the highest temperature rise was measured in the presence of an initial temperature rise as in the theoretical study under the same exposure conditions. Mean temperature rises for tissue without an initial temperature rise and for tissue with an initial temperature rise were 2.42 +/- 0.13 degrees C and 3.62 +/- 0.17 degrees C, respectively. Both theoretical and experimental studies show that unless the initial temperature rise produced by the first ultrasound examination decreases to 0 degrees C, the next ultrasound examination on the same tissue sample may cause the temperature rise to be higher than expected.