Summary This study evaluates the degree and relevance of persisting ototoxicity after cisplatin-based standard-dose chemotherapy for testicular cancer, with emphasis on identification of potential factors for an increased risk of this late sequel. Hearing thresholds of 86 patients with a median age of 31 years (range 21-53 years) and a median follow-up time of 58 months (range 15-159 months) were assessed by conventional pure-tone audiometry. Interviews were conducted evaluating the patients' history with special regard to audiological risk factors, as well as circumstances of ototoxic symptoms. Details concerning treatment and patient variables were extracted retrospectively from the patients' charts. An additional screening programme assessed current body functions, blood parameters and other late toxicities. Symptomatic ototoxicity persisted in 20% of patients (59% tinnitus, 18% hearing loss, 23% both), while 10% had experienced completely reversible ototoxic symptoms for a duration of 1-18 months after treatment. Symptoms were bilateral in 81 % of patients. Hearing thresholds were compatible with cisplatin-induced hearing loss in 42% of audiograms performed. Subjective (history) and objective (audiogram) findings were not always consistent. The following statistically significant risk factors for ototoxicity were established: high cumulative dose of cisplatin (P < 0.0001); history of noise exposure (P = 0.006). Additionally, high doses of vincristine (P = 0.001) seemed to result in reversible ototoxic symptoms. No other independent risk factors were identified. In conclusion, persisting ototoxicity represents a clinical sequel for approximately 20% of testicular cancer patients treated at standard dose but may affect more than 50% of patients receiving cumulative doses of cisplatin > 400 mg m-2. Previous noise exposure may also result in a threefold increased risk for cisplatin ototoxicity. Future studies should use these risk factors as important stratification criteria for trials aiming at the evaluation and prevention of cisplatin-induced ototoxicity.Keywords: chemotherapy; ototoxicity; long-term toxicity; testicular cancerThe ototoxic potential of the chemotherapeutic agent cisplatin was recognized 2 decades ago (Piel et al, 1974). Despite the widespread use of cisplatin in standard treatment protocols for testicular, ovarian, head and neck, lung and other types of cancers, data on the frequencies of ototoxicity are not consistent, and risk factors have not been clearly identified so far. The measurement of the auditory function is limited because of the different diagnostic methods used for objective assessment and the subjective perception of symptoms; patients' characteristics, such as age or noise exposure, may additionally influence the hearing ability and different definitions of 'normal' and 'abnormal' hearing thresholds may also cause further discrepancies in reported results.In the current study the auditory function was evaluated in a homogeneous group of young men receiving cisplatin-based com...

The cumulative dose of P was a major predictor for toxicity. Patients and treatment characteristics such as noise exposure, age, history of smoking, and mode of B application were less important. Further clinical trials should evaluate the sequelae of chemotherapy treatment for testicular cancer prospectively.

No abstract

Patients with end-stage analgesic nephropathy bear a higher risk for urothelial cancer than do patients with other renal diseases. In a retrospective study in patients with analgesic nephropathy and kidney transplants we analyzed the prevalence and clinical course of de novo urothelial cancer. Diagnosis of analgesic nephropathy was based on the patients' history and clinical data. Only patients under cyclosporine treatment were included. Between 1968 and 1993, 2,371 kidney transplants were performed on 2,072 patients in the Department of Abdominal and Transplant Surgery. The prevalence of analgesic nephropathy was 3.1%. Of 65 patients with analgesic nephropathy and kidney transplants, 10 (15.4%) developed urothelial carcinoma; 10.8%, bladder cancer; and 9.1%, renal pelvic cancer. The mean age at diagnosis was 56.1 years. Urothelial cancer occurred on average at 33.6 months posttransplantation. On average, 6 of 10 patients with urothelial cancer died of the disease at 16.9 months after the diagnosis. All patients with urothelial bladder cancer had a muscle-infiltrating tumor of moderate or high grade. Since urothelial renal pelvic cancer occurred in 9.1% of our patients with analgesic nephropathy and urological screening is insufficient in patients on dialysis, we suggest that prophylactic nephroureterectomy be performed on one side before transplantation and on the contralateral side at 3-6 months after transplantation. An aggressive approach is indicated in patients with urothelial cancer of the bladder.

No abstract